1 August 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- The Washington Post, July 31, 2000 Dot.Mil Deaf Ears By William M. Arkin Special to washingtonpost.com Monday, July 31, 2000 You send an e-mail, fax a friend, talk on your cell phone or participate in an Internet chat session; you can be sure that the National Security Agency is listening. Get a grip. . . . The Internet might be all Echelon, all the time, but in the real world, the NSA can barely track all the foreign leaders, diplomats, governments, military units, terrorists, international drug dealers and criminals it is directed to snoop on. Add to that the explosion of fiber optics and wireless devices, which presents eavesdroppers with new challenges of interception at the very times when there is a quantum increase in the overall volume of communications. Throw in the increasingly difficult task of "breaking" ever more sophisticated codes, and you might ask yourself the question as to why any sane person would conclude that Big Brother has the resources, let alone the interest, to keep tabs on you or me. The Know Nothings A ha, I can hear the paranoids responding, that's where Echelon comes in. This five-government "global surveillance system" is the very computer system that allows huge volumes to be sifted without human intervention. Echelon, controlled by the NSA at Fort Meade, Md., in cooperation with Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, allows governments to specify the subjects they are interested in, and Echelon automatically routes material - faxes, e-mail traffic, telephone calls - from the big ear to prying eyes. Is Echelon, as the American Civil Liberties Union says, "the most powerful intelligence gathering organization in the world"? Or is it, as the equally liberal National Security Archive says, "a more limited program"? I tend to fall in the archive's camp. One of the reasons the archive thinks Echelon's assault on privacy is overblown is not just the web of oversight that exists in the post-Vietnam, post-Watergate era. They and other sane skeptics of Echelon-mania point to technological barriers that stand in the way of an all-hearing, all-seeing network. Sifting Through While I agree that Echelon is only symbolic of American imperialism and privacy denied, the latest anti-McDonald's rant from Europeans who should be asking questions about their own governments, the Internet and portable device explosion has propelled the intelligence listeners to obtain new hardware and software to satisfy even the worst nightmares. Enter the Multi-Intelligence and Information Exploitation (MIITE) research program of the Air Force Research Laboratory in Rome, N.Y. The laboratory describes the $25 million three-year effort as focusing on "identifying and developing technology to support global awareness, data fusion, dynamic planning, data warehouse functions, and force execution." In English? Synetics Corp., a subsidiary of BAE Systems and the prime contractor, coordinates 45 teammates ranging from the largest defense contractors (Lockheed Martin, Computer Sciences Corp.) to niche intelligence companies such as Delfin and QuesTech, all of whom specialize in signal processing and data management to develop some of the very capabilities to do what Echelon opponents believe is already being done. According to Air Force documents associated with the May 1999 contract, MIITE brings together the efforts of 79 disparate information technology research projects, many of which have shown promise in dealing with huge amounts of information to create predictive intelligence on the battlefield. One goal is to solve the bottlenecks associated with intercepted material. You're Hearing Voices Projects 32 through 39 of MIITE are developing new automated audio exploitation techniques to improve the speed and breadth of intelligence collection. Intelligence agencies have identified a "serious shortfall in ability to identify and handle large volumes of communication messages," the Air Force documents say. Project 32 is developing the capability to identify languages and dialects "independent of speaker and what is being said." In the first phase of research, language databases were developed and tested against thousands of transmissions. The result? Eighty-one percent recognition of five languages by listening to less than a half a second of speech. Peruvian and Cuban dialects were distinguished in Spanish language traffic with 80 percent accuracy. Project 33 has demonstrated the ability to identify and sort 41 separate male speakers with 86 percent accuracy within just two seconds of hearing each speaker. Project 34 has demonstrated identical accuracy in recognizing 60 speakers after training on about six seconds of speech. The goal? Message sorting by speaker, aircraft identification by pilot's voice, automatic language to language and then voice to text transcription. Project 38 is even working on recognizing cellular phone and frequency hopping data with only one second or less of transmission so digital signals in the air that are sliced up into tiny packets for transmission to cell towers can be reconstructed both accurately and quickly without having to intercept the transmission at its source. MIITE is a rare opportunity to get a look at the state of art in the business of collecting and sifting huge amounts of difficult-to-process information. The technologies being researched should give some indication of both the enormous difficulties the intelligence monitors face in a world where their targets are so varied and the technologies so uncooperative. MIITE hardly scratches the surface of NSA's direct research efforts, to be sure. But the notion that the government can simply listen in on any communication in any mode and that someone in the government has the time or would actually be interested in analyzing stray traffic when extracting the target material is so difficult should demonstrate how utterly and totally off-base Echelon paranoia is. Contact William Arkin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] � 2000 The Washington Post Company <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
