WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!
On the last page (page 19) of this treasonous document we read:
The manufacture of armaments would be
prohibited except for those agreed types and
quantifies to be used by the U.N. Peace Force
and those required to maintain internal order.
All other armaments would be destroyed or
converted to peaceful purposes.
Please note that this puts the U.S. government on record in
support of a plan to make all nations subservient to the UN; and
that "all armaments" not controlled by the UN would be destroyed,
leaving the UN as the virtual global dictator. And since no
provision is made for an exemption of arms owned by private
citizens (and since the UN itself is hardly sympathetic to private
gun ownership), it is reasonable to assume that private arms are
intended for destruction under the term "all armaments."
To initiate this program, President Kennedy signed Public Law
87-297 (H.R. 9118), creating the United States Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency (ACDA). According to that legislation, "as
defined in this Act, the terms 'arms control' and 'disarmament'
mean 'the identification, verification, inspection, limitation,
control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments
of all kinds under international agreement to establish an
effective system of international control..." (emphasis added).
It cannot be stressed too strongly that just as domestic gun
control does not; mean the total elimination of all firearms,
neither does international disarmament mean the total elimination
of all armies, armaments, and nuclear weapons. It is no more
possible to eliminate all guns than it is to put the nuclear genie
back in the lamp. In both cases, what really is being proposed is
the transfer of control over all weapons to a central government,
resulting in the concentration of force and the creation of a
monopoly of power. In the case of domestic gun control, that means
an all-powerful police state. In the case of international
disarmament, it means an all-powerful global police state.
In its Second Annual Report to Congress (February 1963), the ACDA
presented a simple graphic depiction (see above) demonstrating its
proposed three-stage disarmament process. Observe that in Stage
III, as explained in Freedom From War, the U.S. armed forces cease
to exist and only "internal security forces" -- i.e. those to be
used against American citizens -- are permitted. Of course, under
this scheme, the UN "peacekeeping machinery" will be superior to
the "internal security forces" and will be able to dictate the
"laws" that will be enforced.
CFR Connection
How is it possible that such a patently treasonous and suicidal
proposal could become official U.S. policy, embedded in U.S. laws
and U.S.-ratified treaties? As with so many other treacherous
acts, policies, and programs of the past several decades, the
trail leads to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a group
Harvard historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. (who was himself a CFR
member and a special assistant to President Kennedy) has called
the "front organization" for "the heart of the American
Establishment." Former CFR member Admiral Chester Ward charged the
organization with "promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S.
sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful
one-world government."
Official responsibility for developing and initiating the
disarmament program outlined in Freedom From War goes to President
Kennedy and his Secretaries of State (Dean Rusk) and Defense
(Robert S. McNamara), all three of whom were members of the CFR.
The real authors of Freedom From War and Public Law 87-297,
however, were John J. McCloy, the chairman of the CFR, and Arthur
H. Dean, a CFR director.
McCloy, Kennedy's chief disarmament adviser and negotiator with
the Soviets, entered the Establishment through the Wall Street law
firm of Cravath, Swaine and Moore, and later became a senior
partner at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley, and McCloy, a firm closely tied
to the Rockefeller family. He served as an Assistant Secretary of
War under FDR and as U.S. High Commissioner to occupied Germany.
He headed the World Bank, Chase Manhattan Bank, the Ford
Foundation, and the Council on Foreign Relations. He was an
adviser to nine Presidents and sat on the board of directors of
many corporations. Few would dispute journalist Richard Rovere's
characterization of McCloy as "chairman of the American
Establishment."
McCloy's blue-chip r�sum�, however, included a few red flags.
While serving in the War Department, McCloy approved an order
permitting Communist Party members to become officers in the U.S.
Army. He defended identified communist John Carter Vincent and
supported pro-communist atomic scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer. In
1946, FBI head J. Edgar Hoover warned President Truman of an
"enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington," and expressed
concern over the "pro-Soviet leanings" of McCloy, Dean Acheson,
and Alger Hiss. Hiss, of course, was later exposed as a Soviet
agent. He was also a member of the CFR and one of the main
architects of the United Nations.
Assisting McCloy in drafting Freedom From War and the statute for
the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency was Arthur H. Dean. Dean
was also chairman of the U.S. delegation for two years to the UN
disarmament conferences in Geneva. Following the death of John
Foster Dulles (CFR), Dean became the senior partner in the Insider
law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell. He was vice chairman of the
Institute for Pacific Relations (IPR), the communist-run outfit
most responsible -- together with our State Department -- for
turning China over to the communists in 1949. When IPR member
Alfred Kohlberg tried heroically to expose the treason within IPR,
it was Dean who scuttled the investigation. In 1952 the U.S.
Senate Judiciary Committee issued a scathing report on the IPR,
citing it as "an instrument of Communist policy, propaganda and
military intelligence." The Senate report also concluded:
Members of the small core of officials and
staff members who controlled IPR were either
Communist or pro-Communist ....
The effective leadership of the IPR used IPR
prestige to promote the interests of the
Soviet Union in the United States ....
The IPR was a vehicle used by the Communists
to orientate American far eastern policy
toward Communist objectives.
Yet Dean and McCloy, with the help of their CFR associates in the
Establishment media, passed themselves off as Republicans, and
conservative, anticommunist Republicans at that.
"Shock Treatment"
Another important influence on the Kennedy-CFR disarmament plan
was Establishment Wall Street lawyer Grenville Clark. McCloy had
worked closely with Clark in the Military Training Camps
Association. Clark was vice president of the globalist United
World Federalists and co-author with Professor Louis B. Sohn (CFR)
of World Peace Through World Law (1958). "It has been well said,"
averred Clark, "that in our modern age the obdurate adherence to
national sovereignty and national armed forces represents a form
of insanity which may, however, be cured by a species of shock
treatment."
He spelled out that "shock treatment" in World Peace Through World
Law, a detailed plan for socialist world government through a
revised UN Charter. This text, venerated by all "world order"
advocates, proposes a global superstate in which a "world police
force" known as the United Nations Peace Force would be invested
with "a coercive force of overwhelming power." "This world police
force," wrote Clark and Sohn, "would be the only military force
permitted anywhere in the world after the process of national
disarmament has been completed."
But, say the authors, "it must be recognized that even with the
complete elimination of all military forces there would
necessarily remain substantial, although strictly limited and
lightly armed, internal police forces and that these police
forces, supplemented by civilians armed with sporting rifles and
fowling pieces, might conceivably constitute a serious threat to a
neighboring country in the absence of a well-disciplined and
heavily armed world police." Accordingly, "the United Nations
Peace Force shall be regularly provided with the most modern
weapons and equipment," and with special provision being made "for
the use of nuclear weapons in extreme circumstances."
Moreover, Chapter 3, Article 14 of the Clark/Sohn UN scheme orders
strict controls on the possession of arms and ammunition by police
and private citizens:
No nation shall allow the possession by its
internal police forces of any arms or
equipment except of the types permitted by the
regulations adopted by the General Assembly
... and in no case shall the number of
revolvers and rifles combined exceed one for
each member of the internal police forces, the
number of automatic rifles one for each
hundred members of such forces, and the
ammunition supplies 100 rounds per rifle or
revolver and 1,000 rounds per automatic rifle.
No nation shall allow the possession by any
public or private organization or individual
of any military equipment whatever or of any
arms except such small arms as are reasonably
needed by duly licensed hunters or by duly
licensed individuals for personal protection.
The plan also would eliminate the "problem" of private citizens'
access to ammunition by providing that "No nation shall produce or
allow the production of any explosives except in so far as the
General Assembly may authorize...." Moreover, "every nation shall
obtain a special license from the [UN] Inspector-General for: ...
The operation by it or by any public or private organization or
individual ... engaged in the production of any light arms,
ammunition ... or of tools for any such production."
And what if you fail to turn in or register, say, your .22 rifle,
your .38 pistol, or your gun powder and reloading equipment, and
you are charged with unlawful possession of "military equipment"
under the UN General Assembly's ever-changing regulations? A UN
tribunal will be your judge and jury. Clark and Sohn say:
In order to provide means for the trial of
individuals accused of violating the
disarmament provisions of the revised Charter
or of other offenses against the Charter or
laws enacted by the General Assembly ...
provision is also made for regional United
Nations courts, inferior to the International
Court of Justice, and for the review by the
International Court of decisions of these
regional courts.
The Hour Is Late
The diabolical plan for total national and individual disarmament
spelled out by Clark and Sohn in 1958 was initiated by the CFR
coterie in the Kennedy Administration and has been carried forward
by CFR one-worlders in each successive Administration. This
conspiracy for empowering the United Nations with unprecedented
and unparalleled force, if allowed to succeed, would establish a
global tyranny so monstrous that the murderous regimes of Hitler,
Stalin, and Mao would pale by comparison.
Our Founding Fathers provided us with the tools to fight this
Godless drive. But for too long good Americans have allowed a
state of slumber to overtake them, until now "the night is far
spent." Though the hour is late, with diligent effort we can yet
reclaim our heritage of freedom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]
Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
******************************************************************************
*******************
A vote for Bush or Gore is a vote to continue Clinton policies!
A vote for Buchanan is a vote to continue America!
Therefore a vote for Gore or Bush is a wasted vote for America!
Don't waste your vote! Vote for Patrick Buchanan!
Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a
snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become
nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey...
Patrick Buchanan
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
