WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

  Gun Grabbers' Global Gestapo

                            by William F. Jasper

     That the citizens of the United States of America are being
     disarmed -- both as individuals and as a nation -- can hardly be
     questioned. Succumbing to the siren promises of peace and safety,
     we are giving up our weapons to Godless global planners, who in
     turn are delivering us over to enemies -- both foreign and
     domestic -- who despise the foundations upon which our beloved
     nation was founded.

     A major problem for the American people in recognizing the
     terrible danger and treachery involved in our disarmament is the
     fact that it has been occurring as a gradual process rather than a
     single, discreet act. Domestic disarmament ("gun control") and
     national disarmament ("international arms control") have been
     proceeding simultaneously over the past 30 years, promoted by the
     same subversive forces. The gun control "movement," if allowed to
     succeed, will result in an unarmed American citizenry cowering
     before street criminals and completely subject to a totalitarian
     dictatorship run by even more dangerous criminals in Washington.
     The arms control "movement," meanwhile, is pushing us ever closer,
     and at an accelerating pace, toward a global tyranny in which
     control over our military has been relinquished to an all-powerful
     United Nations.

     The central problem for the American people, however, in
     recognizing the danger before us, is our collective blindness due
     to the intellectual, moral and spiritual disarmament we have
     already permitted. The popular notions that guns cause crime and
     that armies and military weapons cause war -- and that the
     solution, therefore, is to disarm completely individuals and
     nations and transfer all weapons to a single governing authority
     -- are frightening manifestations of the extent of that
     disarmament. It is a sad reflection of the abandonment of the

     Christian worldview, which holds that war and crime are caused by
     men yielding to the sinful impulses of their fallen nature and
     violating the laws of God and society. The solution then, is
     two-fold: to work for the increase of virtue through the
     conversion of sinners, and to establish and maintain a just social
     order that recognizes the right, and allows the means, of both the
     individual and the nation-state to self-defense.



     Jesus Christ himself taught: "When a strong man armed keepeth his
     court, those things are in peace which he possesseth. But if a
     stronger than he come upon him and overcome him, he will take away
     all his armour wherein he trusted, and will distribute his spoils"
     (Luke 11:21-22). Obviously, it is important to be armed
     physically, but trust in material arms is foolish if we do not
     also "put on the whole armour of God" (Ephesians 6:13).

     If we are to remain a free people, it is essential for Americans
     to be both spiritually and physically armed -- as individuals and
     as a nation. Unfortunately, we have allowed evil men to sow the
     seeds of individual and national disarmament -- both spiritually
     and materially -- for decades.

     Global Gun Control

     Many Americans undoubtedly were alarmed to read in their
     newspapers on May 24, 1994 a story by Associated Press reporter
     Charles J. Hanley on a new United Nations stealth gun control
     initiative for the whole world. The AP article reported:

               So quietly that even the gun lobby hasn't
               noticed, the United Nations is beginning to
               set its sights on global gun control.

               The U.N. Disarmament Commission has adopted a
               working paper, a basis for future debate, that
               proposes fighter controls on the gun trade in
               the United States and other member nations as
               a way of combating international arms
               trafficking.

     That same day, the Washington Times, in an article entitled "U.S.
     OKs study of U.N. gun control," reported on the same development:



               The Clinton administration has agreed to
               participate in a discussion of ways for the
               United Nations to control the manufacture of
               guns and their sales to civilians.
               This represents the first U.N. effort to
               foster regulation of the multi-billion-dollar
               trade in small arms ....

               The U.N. working paper declares that
               governments individually are "impotent" to
               deal with global arms trafficking and proposes
               "harmonization" of gun control standards
               around the world to make trafficking easier to
               spot and prevent.

               "The arms permitted for civilian use ...
               should be subject to controls at all points in

               the chain, from production and/or acquisition
               up to the time they are sold to an individual.
               From then on they should remain subject to
               monitoring and control," the paper says.

               Any "harmonization" would inevitably mean
               tightening controls on the loosely regulated
               U.S. gun business ....

     Naturally, in the United Nations, where the vast majority of
     member states are authoritarian regimes, "harmonization" means
     that American citizens must yield their rights for the common
     "global good." The UN Charter, of course, like most of the
     national constitutions of UN member states, recognizes no
     God-given individual rights and certainly no individual right to
     keep and bear arms.

     Bureaucratic Runaround

     Considering the brazen assault this represents on a fundamental
     human right and on American national sovereignty, it is
     understandable that both the UN and the Clinton Administration
     would want to keep this subversive initiative as quiet as possible
     and would be reluctant to discuss it. Officials at the U.S. State
     Department and the UN rebuffed repeated attempts by THE NEW
     AMERICAN to obtain a copy of the working paper or to discuss it in
     detail. First we were told that the AP and Washington Times
     reports were erroneous and exaggerated, and that concern was
     overblown. Unconvinced, we insisted we would like to judge for
     ourselves by examining the document.

     At State, after several office transfers, we were informed that
     Ambassador Stephen Ledogar, the U.S. representative on the
     Disarmament Commission, was out of the country and no one else
     knew how to obtain a copy of the document. At the UN, after six
     departmental transfers, we reached the director of the UN
     Disarmament Commission, a Mr. Sohrab Kheradi, who informed us that
     the report would not be released until mid-July. However, under
     our persistent entreaties, Mr. Kheradi agreed that he would
     arrange for THE NEW AMERICAN to receive a pre-release copy
     forthwith.

     Days passed, still no working paper. More calls to the UN and more
     promises to send the report. Weeks passed. Finally, we reached the
     secretary of the Disarmament Commission himself, Mr. Kuo-chung
     Lin, who had been away on vacation. Mr. Lin assured us that the
     concerns stirred by initial news coverage of the working paper
     were "based on a misunderstanding" of the nature and significance
     of the report. "This is only the report of the chairman of the
     Working Group [on disarmament]" on the group's proposed agenda
     "for discussion over the next two years," he explained. "It
     doesn't establish any policy or have any binding effect." But is
     it not true, we asked, that its purpose is to encourage the
     establishment of policy that will have "binding effect"? No, no,
     he laughed. Its purpose is simply to encourage "debate and

     discussion."

     Of course, as a UN official from Communist China, where debate and
     discussion can land you in prison, and where unarmed dissenters
     are unceremoniously squashed beneath the tracks of army tanks, Mr.
     Lin's cavalier attitude toward attacks on the Second Amendment is
     understandable, even expected.

     High-Level Treason

     The attitudes of American officials, who have taken an oath of
     office to defend and protect the Constitution, are far more
     troubling. Unfortunately, it will come as a shock to most
     Americans to learn that the proposal and "discussion" of UN gun
     controls applicable to U.S. citizens is not new. It is the
     culmination of a program of national disarmament launched by U.S.
     officials over 30 years ago. The program was unveiled at the UN on
     September 25, 1961 by President Kennedy. Entitled Freedom From
     War: The United States Program for General and Complete
     Disarmament in a Peaceful World, this document is one of the most
     revolutionary and subversive proposals ever put forward by any
     government official. Incredibly, the program originally introduced
     in this document became -and remains -- official U.S. government
     policy.

     In short, Freedom From War is a proposal for the complete
     surrender of the United States armed forces to the United Nations.
     It calls for a three-stage disarmament process leading to the
     transfer of all national military forces -- including those of the
     U.S. and the USSR -- to the United Nations, and the establishment
     of a UN Peace Force as the unchallengeable global military power.

     In its own words, Freedom From War (pages 18-19) states:

               In Stage III progressive controlled
               disarmament ... would proceed to a point where
               no state would have the military power to
               challenge the progressively strengthened U.N.
               Peace Force ....

     Pages 3 and 4 of Freedom From War list these "specific objectives
     toward which nations should direct their efforts":

               • The disbanding of all national armed forces
               and the prohibition of their reestablishment
               in any form whatsoever other than those
               required to preserve internal order and for
               contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;

               • The elimination from national arsenals of
               all armaments, including all weapons of mass
               destruction and the means for their delivery,
               other than those required for a United Nations
               Peace Force and for maintaining internal
               order...."



*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!


******************************************************************************
*******************
A vote for Bush or Gore is a vote to continue Clinton policies!
A vote for Buchanan is a vote to continue America!
Therefore a vote for Gore or Bush is a wasted vote for America!
Don't waste your vote!  Vote for Patrick Buchanan!


Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a
snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become
nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey...
Patrick Buchanan

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to