-Caveat Lector-

http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2000/10/treaty.html

                      American Civil Liberties Union

                     Federation of American Scientists

                   Lawyers Committee for Human Rights

                 World Organization Against Torture, USA

October 11, 2000

Hon. Porter Goss, Chairman
Hon. Julian Dixon, Ranking Member
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
H-405 Capitol Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-6415

Re: Intelligence Authorization Act, H.R. 4392, and Treaty "Obligations"

Dear Reps. Goss and Dixon:

We are writing to ask that you reject Section 305 of the Senate-passed
version of the Intelligence Authorization Act for FY 2001, H.R. 4392.
Section 305 would legalize "authorized intelligence activity" that is
illegal under the terms of any legislation adopted in the future to
implement a treaty, unless the implementing legislation indicates otherwise.
In essence, it puts intelligence activity above the law. Because this
sweeping change has been the subject of no public hearings and virtually no
public debate, and because this provision would sanction lawless activity,
we urge you to reject it.

Under Section 305, "authorized intelligence activity" that violates any law
enacted in the future to implement a treaty or other international agreement
would be legal, unless the implementing legislation indicated otherwise.
Legislation implementing international treaties prohibits some of the most
heinous conduct imaginable. Treaties into which the United States has or
will soon enter proscribe genocide, bribery, racial discrimination, hostage
taking and hijacking.

For example, the legislation implementing the Convention Against Torture and
Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Punishment establishes that it
is the policy of the United States not to expel, extradite or effect the
involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial
grounds for believing that the person would be in danger of being tortured.
This policy applies regardless of whether the person who might be tortured
is in the United States. Section 2242 of Pub. Law 105-277, 112 Stat.
2681-822 (1998). Had section 305 been law when Congress considered the
legislation implementing the Convention Against Torture, it would be legal
under the statute for a CIA agent acting pursuant to an "authorized
intelligence activity" to return a person to a place where they would be
tortured. This would be the case unless a member of Congress successfully
slipped into the implementing legislation a provision indicating that it
applied to intelligence activity as well.

The very limited Senate debate on this provision indicates that whether a
particular intelligence activity that violates a law implementing a treaty
is "authorized" is unclear. For example, it appears that the authorization
need not be written and need not be issued specifically with respect to the
conduct in question. Rather, as Senator Shelby put it, "Individual actions
might be authorized through general written policies, rather than
case-specific authorizations." See colloquy between Senators Biden and
Shelby, 146 Cong. Rec. page S9686-7, October 3, 2000. This is an invitation
for abuse of authority to evade a law by which every other government
official must abide.

There can be no excuse for giving intelligence agencies a license to ignore
the law, including laws that implement treaty obligations. To create such a
blanket exception for "authorized intelligence activities" is to invite
other countries that undertake treaty obligations to except these and other
activities from the requirements of the treaty. This provision would ensure
that there is no public debate as to whether there should be an
"intelligence exception" to a future treaty obligation proscribing
objectionable conduct. We urge you to reject it.

Sincerely,

Laura W. Murphy, Director
American Civil Liberties Union
Washington National Office

Steven Aftergood, Project Director
Federation of American Scientists

Elisa Massiminoe, Director
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights

Morton Sklar, Director
World Organization Against Torture, USA






________________________________________________________
                           1stUp.com - Free the Web
   Get your free Internet access at http://www.1stUp.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to