-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Defense denies sharing secrets with China
Briefing on U.S. bombing, strafing methods called 'imaginary' training

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--


By Charles Smith
© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com 

Despite U.S. Air Force and Defense Department documents showing the Air Force 
instructed representatives of the Communist Chinese military about bombing 
and strafing missions, the Clinton administration is denying Chinese air 
force officers were "briefed on 'Combat Readiness'" during a 1999 tour of 
Edwards Air Force base in California. 

In a four-page letter of reply to Congress, Undersecretary of Defense Walter 
Slocombe stated that the 1999 Chinese air force visit was for "safety" 
reasons, and that simulated "bombing" missions given to the Chinese military 
were "imaginary training."  
This official U.S. Air Force photo shown to Chinese army air force officers 
shows the TRN-45 U.S. mobile military microwave radar system used on airports 
that have been captured or damaged in battle.  

In November, Chairman of the Science Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, 
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R.-Calif., and Rep. Dan Burton, R.-Ind., chairman of 
the House Committee on Government Reform, joined to write a blistering letter 
to Secretary of Defense William Cohen, seeking an explanation for the Chinese 
military visits to America. 

"After reviewing the briefing papers distributed to the Chinese delegation," 
they wrote to Cohen, "we are now concerned that under the guise of 'air 
traffic control,' the U.S. military gave instructions on how our military 
fighter commands utilize civilian air traffic control for tasks such as 'low 
level bombing, inflight refueling' and the coordination of AWACS (airborne 
radar planes) in combat refueling operations. 

"It appears that these briefings not only advised the Chinese on how we 
conduct fighter-bomber operations areas (MOAs), but this will enable them to 
better develop defenses against our Air Force and Navy aviation operations," 
wrote Burton and Rohrabacher. 

In December, Slocombe replied in a letter to Rohrabacher, "A delegation of 
Chinese air traffic control officials visited the U.S. in May 1999 as guests 
of the Federal Aviation Administration. Because many Americans travel abroad 
and U.S. airlines fly around the globe, the United States is deeply 
interested in raising the level of aviation safety in China and elsewhere. 
Safer skies are necessary, not just in the United States, but around the 
world." 

However, according to documents obtained from the Federal Aviation 
Administration, the U.S. Air Force briefings included a simulated "bombing" 
mission. The documents show a "two ship formation of F-16s from Luke AFB, 
Arizona" on a "bombing" and overflight mission in a training area, code-named 
"Baghdad," northwest of Prescott, Arizona. 

Slocombe denied that the simulated "bombing and strafing" mission constituted 
military training for the Chinese air force. According to Slocombe, the 
mission was "imaginary training."  
F-16 Fighting Falcons on "bombing" mission from Luke Air Force Base - an 
official U.S. Air Force document given to the Chinese army air force.  

"The 1998 briefing was centered on a notional example of flight planning and 
coordination of routes for an imaginary training mission, using Luke AFB as a 
backdrop," wrote Slocombe. 

"The briefing also referred to the FAA air route traffic control center 
computer in Albuquerque, New Mexico, as the location where the notional 
flight plan was processed in this scenario. The briefing covered how military 
flights can go back and forth between FAA and USAF air traffic control during 
the execution of their flight," explained Slocombe. 

The Defense undersecretary did not explain what he means by "notional' and 
"imaginary" training, as distinct from current U.S. military training, which 
prominently features simulated and fictional combat missions, and which 
indeed are an integral part of military training worldwide. 

"The notional briefing included a phase in which air traffic control of an 
aircraft was transferred to an AWACS that provided air traffic control for 
the aircraft to be refueled," Slocombe continued. "The information involving 
the tanker and an AWACS was limited to the handling of air traffic control 
during a notional training mission. This did not involve tactical operational 
training or techniques." 

Slocombe also denied that Chinese generals visited Edwards Air Force base in 
May 1999. In his letter, Slocombe correctly noted that the 1999 visit 
included three senior colonels from the Chinese army. But no Chinese general 
is listed as attending. 

"The (1999) delegation was led by members of the State Air Traffic Control 
Commission, and consisted of members from the Chinese Aviation Administration 
Air Traffic Control Management Bureau of the General Administration of Civil 
Aviation in China and air traffic control experts from the People's 
Liberation Army. There was not, however, a member of the delegation named PLA 
General Li Yongtai, nor were any members of the delegation PLA general 
officers," noted Slocombe. 

However, according to documents obtained from the Federal Aviation 
Administration, People's Liberation Army Gen. Li Yongtai did visit the United 
States -- not in 1999, but in 1993, and under very strange circumstances. The 
FAA documents from 1993 note that Gen. Li Yongtai and Gen. Kui Fulin visited 
America not as military men, but as civilians -- alias "Mr. Li Yongtai" and 
"Mr. Kui Fulin," Commissioners in the Air Traffic Control Commission of 
China.  
Official U.S. Air Force document given to the Chinese army air force. F-16 
Fighting Falcon from the 389th Fighter Squadron - T Bolt Zero One  

The handy transformation of military chiefs into harmless civilians might 
have been accomplished unnoticed, except that an unknown Federal Aviation 
Administration official hand-marked "Deputy Chief of General Staff, PLA" next 
to Mr. Kui Fulin, and "Lt. General, PLAF" next to Mr. Li Yongtai on the 1993 
China Air Traffic Control Survey Delegation list. 

Who are these Chinese civilian air traffic control officials? According to 
publicly available information, Gen. Kui Fulin was the Chinese military 
operations director at the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. 

In all, the unknown FAA officer hand-marked seven of the 15 visiting Chinese 
civilians as "Military." 

In his reply letter, Slocombe also denied that the Chinese air force officers 
had been briefed on military tactical air control or military navigation 
systems. U.S. Air Force documents show that the Chinese officers were briefed 
on "Air Traffic Control And Landing Systems (ATCALS)." Slocombe stated that 
the Chinese delegation was just shown "pictures" of U.S. military tactical 
electronics. 

"Pictures of some tactical systems were included in the briefings on how the 
FAA and USAF cooperate in logistical support efforts. However, these photos 
were not in the translated briefing slides given to the delegation," noted 
Slocombe. 

The U.S. Air Force briefing materials also included advanced military 
electronics such as "GPN-12 & 20 Surveillance Radars," the "FPN-62 & GPN-22 
Precision Approach Radar," and the "TRN-45 Mobile Microwave Landing Sys." 
Slocombe, however, denied that the military electronics were shown to the 
Chinese army officers. 

"The delegation was not presented with a briefing or display of the MMLS 
(mobile microwave landing system). A photo of the MMLS, however, was included 
in the logistical support briefing, but no operational capabilities or 
essential elements of information were briefed or discussed. The briefing 
translation provided to the delegation did not have a copy of the photo 
included," explained Slocombe. 

Despite Slocombe's denials, according to FAA documentation, the U.S./Chinese 
military-to-military contacts are scheduled to continue. 

"Future exchanges and cooperative activities" are scheduled "through the year 
2000," states a 1998 "Record of Discussion" signed by Federal Aviation 
Administration official John R. Hancock and Qu Yong Xiu from the Chinese 
Office of state Air Traffic Commission. 

"During the last six months of 1999, a United States delegation will be 
invited to participate in a technical seminar in China to exchange 
information and views on the development and operation of air traffic 
systems, including flight processing, radar control and communications 
systems," states the FAA document. 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

Charles Smith is a national security and defense reporter for WorldNetDaily. 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--



*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, 
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use 
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational 
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

<A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÚrchives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝo subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send 
email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to