-Caveat Lector-

Film Resurrects Waco
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=443

      Wed Apr 4 12:12:26 2001

      Neal Knox Report

      Film Resurrects Waco

      By Neal Knox

      WASHINGTON, D.C. (April 2) — The Danforth Special Counsel
      investigation of the FBI's final attack on the Branch Davidians
at Waco
      — and Danforth's claim "with 100 percent certainty" that the FBI
never
      fired on Mt. Carmel — seemed to have buried that story forever.

      It just got resurrected. Maybe.

      "The FLIR Project" is the third Mike McNulty film about the fire
that
      killed 80 men, women and children April 19, 1993.

      It examines the "evidence" that caused Danforth to declare that
the
      staccato flashes visible on a Forward Looking InfraRed (FLIR)
video are
      not gunfire, as several prominent infrared experts have claimed.

      The flashes, which show up as hot spots on heat-sensing infrared
film,
      were captured by an FBI aircraft at the time of the final fire.
Special
      Counsel and former Senator John Danforth (R-Mo.) found that the
      flashes were merely "reflections" or "glints" from glass or
trash,
      lasting too long to be gunfire.

      Those seeming gunflashes were among the most damning evidence in
the
      two earlier McNulty films, the award-winning "Waco: The Rules of
      Engagement" (produced with Dan Gifford) and "Waco: A New
      Revelation."

      Sen. Danforth (who professed to be a defender of gun rights
until he
      announced his retirement, when he "courageously" blasted NRA),
was
      appointed by Attorney General Janet Reno to investigate the FLIR
      evidence. His deputy was former U.S. Attorney Ed Dowd, who had
used
      his office to oppose Missouri's 1999 concealed carry initiative,
and is
      now Danforth's law partner.

      The Special Counsel's office set up a test at Ft. Hood, near
Waco. It
      would supposedly "exactly replicate" the conditions at Mt.
Carmel church
      in 1993 — same weapons, ammo, and uniforms, and similar climatic
      conditions and infrared camera,

      (When such a test was first proposed, Justice Department claimed
it
      would be impossible to exactly duplicate necessary conditions
such as the
      soil temperature; they also falsely claimed the type of FLIR
camera used
      no longer existed and could not be duplicated.)

      The Ft. Hood test was shot from a British military aircraft
using a nearly
      identical FLIR camera. It clearly showed the heat signatures of
people on
      the ground, unlike the 1993 video, in which no "shooters" can be
seen.

      There was an obvious reason: McNulty's new video reveals that
not only
      was the Ft. Hood test conducted on a 65-degree day, the test
area was wet
      down and covered with a tarp the night before, resulting in even
greater
      temperature differences between soldiers and soil.

      "The FLIR Project" conducted its own test using a high crane-
mounted
      FLIR camera on an 85-degree morning last September. Wearing the
same
      type IFR-suppressed Army BDU uniforms worn by the FBI Hostage
      Rescue Team (HRT) and in the Ft. Hood "replication," McNulty's
testers
      are invisible unless moving.

      The government claims the Waco FBI FLIR flashes aren't gunfire
      because they last as much as 133 milliseconds, as measured by the
      number of video frames, while flashes from military ammo in an M-
16A2
      last only 8 milliseconds.

      As shooters know, the shorter a barrel, the greater the muzzle
flash.
      Propellant in military 5.56 ammo is coated to produce minimum
flash in a
      standard 20-inch barrel M-16A2, the combination used in
Danforth's Ft.
      Hood test.

      But FBI photos from Waco, obtained under the Freedom of
Information
      Act, shows HRT agents carrying CAR-16 or M-4 carbines with 14
      1/2-inch barrels. Other FOIA photos show they were carrying
Federal
      commercial ammo.

      Although the flashes in the FBI FLIR appear to be bursts of full-
auto fire,
      the Ft. Hood tests were fired only semi-auto.

      "The FLIR Project" test shows that an M-16 with GI ammo produces
an
      almost imperceptible flash, but an M-4 carbine with Federal ammo
      produces a flash four times longer — though still shorter
duration than
      flashes on the FBI film.

      However, when testers threw dust into the air to simulate the
fine dust
      resulting from tank treads and the building demolition, the FLIR
camera
      recorded M-4/Federal flashes almost identical to those on the
FBI film.

      McNulty's film shows a frame by frame view of a three-round
burst in
      dust lasting 11 fields of continuous video footage — about 173
      milliseconds.

      That's critical, for duration of the flashes was the "scientific
      certainty" that Federal Judge Walter Smith cited in dismissing
the
      Davidian survivors' wrongful death lawsuit against the
government.

      Using the wrong gun and ammo in Danforth's Ft. Hood test could
have
      been a simple goof, the 20-degree cooler day could have been a
fluke of
      nature and bad timing, but watering down the test area — cooling
the
      ground and killing the dust — was deliberate.

      So was the decision to shoot only semi-auto.

      Danforth's Ft. Hood tests weren't botched; they were rigged.


      Advance copies of "FLIR Project" are available for $19.95 from
      866-688-3547

      http://www.NealKnox.com/index.html


      Why Waco?
      http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wacopg.htm

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to