-Caveat Lector-

have become so cynical that I doubt this whole episode is an
accident.  Like out bombing of the embassy, it is just so
convenient when these things happen.  could this be to
off-set any tax cuts proposed?  Sure, our good and wonderful
govt WANTS to give us a tax cut but they will need that
money to protect us from this great Yellow Peril!  Guess we
will just have to give it back, and more, so they can take
action against this sort of thing!  And it works on the
Chinese as well.  They may not have much money but they can
protest less over the taking of slave/prisoners if it is for
a good cause like protecting them from us!  <sigh>

Well, they TRIED to give us a tax cut, they really did.
<wink, wink!> But these mean old Chinese wouldn't leave us
alone so guess we have to give it back to be protected from
them.  And someone somewhere needs a few billion in defense
contracts. Sadly enough, I also think they would actually go
to war, both sides.  Isn't that the traditional way to
improve our economy?  Would this be the first time such a
thing has been done?
Amelia

 Sunday, April 08, 2001 10:16 PM
Subject: [Clinton's Army All That They Can Be


~~for educational purposes only~~
[Title 17 U.S.C. section 107]

Clinton's Army  All That They Can Be
by Michael Peirce

I'm having trouble buying into this "crisis." It's
not that I'm fearless and have no concern if the
country blunders into a new world war, far from it.
I'm just outright flabbergasted that this has
happened at all, and even more so by the reaction
of my friends on the right.

They apparently think there are two sets of rules
for international conduct. Few of us can have missed
the hoopla about Chinese companies buying into to
our erstwhile "possession," the Panama Canal and
renting a major naval base in California. This was
and is conceived of by Americans as aggression
against this country.

Now we investigate the other side of the coin and
let's see what America feels is the acceptable for
international conduct by Americans.

Recently we violated all norms of international
behavior by blasting the dickens out of a Christian
country which has long served Europe as the so
called military frontier against Muslim invasion.
I'm talking about Serbia of course. While we were
at it, we ruthlessly bombed the Chinese consulate,
killing Chinese nationals. Deliberately, and with malice
aforethought. In criminal court, that is called murder.

Many in congress and our war like "conservative"
pundits constantly remind us that our "real" enemy
is China. Why? Because they oppress Christians, we
are told. Huh? It's open season on Christians here
in America. Those vicious, treasonous communists of the
ACLU are actually telling us that it is improper to
say grace at VMI. So following that logic, and if
the Chinese responded in kind  would they bomb our
consulate? Send a spy plane to patrol off our coast?

The Chinese use labor from prison camps to produce
the goods with which they are flooding our markets
and taking American jobs. OK. Then why did congress
change the name of the "Most Favored Trading" status
so that they could award it to the Chinese? Why do
Americans buy these "tainted" goods? And in the
interests of exposing hypocrisy whenever I can  why
do we insist that our own prison population, which by
the way, exceeds in numbers that of any other country
in the world including China, are made to work? Is it
not slave labor to use prisoners to work? Those are
the guys in the white jackets and striped pants you
see cleaning up the roads in Georgia. If it is slave
labor in China, it is slave labor in America.

Ultimately, what happens in China is not our business.
If we were minding our own business, as we should,
our America would not have become a cesspool.

The Chinese in fact, have one rule of criminal law in
which I find considerable merit  they shoot corrupt
politicians!

Bill Clinton, that cheap crook who filled his pockets
with Chinese money, left us a situation where they are
considerably better armed and technologically more
astute than they were eight years ago. Trading with
them is one thing  but why on earth would we sell
weaponry to them? Indeed, why sell weapons to anyone?!
In the case of the Chinese, we are routinely condemning
them in public forums while making high tech weapons
available to them. What must the Chinese think? Does
the term, "mixed signals," come to mind when you
consider this?

Now, as we start rattling our sabers again, have
any of the right wing conservatives, particularly
the scoundrels of that breed in Washington, pondered
what has happened to the American military? As we
talk tough, we dress our military up in drag  gender
diversity and sensitivity will not help us when then
chips are down, and with our paltry leadership, the
chance of war goes from "maybe" to inevitable.

So let's examine the two parts of this astounding
dichotomy we are living.

First - having a spy plane virtually on the border
of China is an act of aggression, pure and simple.
Second, we better stop beating the war drums because
if the conduct of our "fighting men and women" on
that plane is any example, we better leave the fighting
to the tough guys. As in someone other than our own
military.

Maybe the French could lend us some of their Foreign
Legionnaires?

These military folks of our new and sensitive armed
forces actually landed a plane full of top secret
technology at a Chinese military base rather than
risk their lives by ditching it in the sea or braving
the bullets of the Chinese fighters. Hello? "Duty,
Honor, Country, anyone? Or how about "Death before
dishonor?" These folks will come home eventually
and be treated as heroes. What a sad joke. A real
soldier wouldn't take a free drink in a bar where
those "heroes" had ever set foot.

I bet the Chinese Army folks at Hainan are having a
real laugh over this.

Although it's not exactly like our "elite" troops
were facing the cr�me de la cr�me of the Chinese
fighter force, either. One of the Chinese pilots
managed to knock himself out of the sky while
confronting a prop driven plane?! I'm surprised
his commanding officer didn't send us a thank you
note.

Despite the fact that the US is clearly in the wrong
on this one, the military personal are my real concern.
I, of all people, value military men. I don't believe
the lives of soldiers should be routinely thrown away
nor held as a cheap commodity. Yet there are times
when military men must face danger  this is not about
job training folks, it's about life and death, and
killing people. Their job is to put duty above their
own personal safety. They should have ditched that
plane in the ocean and blown it to smithereens. Or,
let the Chinese shoot it down. But to cravenly put
their own safety ahead of their mission is very
scary indeed.

One other possibility exists: that they were ordered
to meekly submit. Our military was purged under Clinton
so the high command has degenerated into a bunch of
self serving mama's boys. They know they can literally
get away with murder as long as there are no "friendly"
casualties ...

There is something called a "show the flag" mission.
Simply put, you sail a big bad boat up the river and
let those nasty wogs see how dangerous and warlike you
are. It's supposed to intimidate potential enemies so
you won't have to kill them later. This mission was
rather the reverse of that.

We have sent the Chinese a clear message that we have
aggressive intentions toward them and capped it up
by showing them that we are not very tough. Whew.
Talk about a worst case scenario. What genius thought
up this mission? Let's not pretend it was a fluke either
  this has apparently been going on since long before
Clinton slouched off the world stage. Countries that
are at peace with each other should not be playing
tag in the skies from within armed military aircraft.
Have I missed something? Isn't the cold war over?

I'm very concerned about this turn of events from
the point of view of possible consequences. If we
consider the ludicrous series of mistakes that led
to the First World War, we can take a lesson from
it. Politicians posing as diplomats are quite capable
of starting a war where there exists no good reason
for one. In the realm of foreign policy, it is a
truism that the only real job of the diplomat is
to keep his country from accidentally blundering
into war! Is it that hard?

To this writer, our government is corrupt and should
not be trusted with weapons and military force. To
many conservatives the opposite is true  the
neo-cons in particular love to wave the flag and
rally around the state as if the constitution never
existed. The left wingers want a kinder, sensitive
army full of females and homosexuals, but one that
will kill specific enemies who violate their concept
of political correctness. Somehow the end result is
both laughable and dangerous. We have a huge, high
priced military, but it isn't very good! Talk about
getting your money's worth. Everybody loses.

When war finally comes, our military is in deep
trouble. The decent, thoughtful men in uniform are
aware of this. The rest are playing at life, and making
sure they are not victims of discrimination. It's as
good a way as any to duck fatigue details.

Take another look at why our troops handed over a
high tech spy plane without a fight. Could it be that
perhaps they are aware of how silly this has become?
Perhaps they are aware that Clinton betrayed his
country for a few measly bucks yet they are expected
to die fighting against the same Chinese that Clinton
welcomed into the White House. The same Clinton who
saw to it that the votes of soldiers would not be
counted in the last election.

Could it be that the certain knowledge that your
leaders are corrupt is enough to sap the morale of
soldiers?

You bet. Add in the sensitivity training and feminist
propaganda the military has been subjected to, remind
them a couple of times about how Hilary used field
grade officers as waiters, and pretty soon you have
a military that is just not too eager to die for anything.

This being the case  I make this plea to Americans  stop
serving this out of control government. Throw away this
devilish philosophy of moral relativism. Reject the
warfare state and the policy of entangling alliances
with foreign countries and claim what is yours by birth
right  a constitutional republic that holds government
accountable for its actions and keeps it on a short leash.

Our government is embarked on a long term policy that
can lead to only one thing: war. They play these silly
games while our culture is being swamped by mass migration
and are well aware that soon we will be something other
than the country defined in our constitution. In less
than ten years immigrants from failed cultures will
subsume our Western European heritage. These men who
are leading us into war are well aware of that, and
condone it. So here we are  betrayed at home, and
drifting into war abroad. I guess I'm not so surprised
that our troops rolled over after all.

To Southerners I say this: our folks have always been
warlike and quick to support the government when it
gets down to fighting. Stop it! This is the same
government that treats us like subjects, not citizens.
This government brags openly of defeating us and burning
our cities. This government mocks our history and our
traditions and rules us like what we are  a conquered
province in a despotic empire. Boys, I know you like
to fight  but it's time for some common sense.
Pick your battles with care. This one has nothing to
do with us.

This year, my church has had the sad duty of burying
the sons of several of our members. There is not much
you can say to people who have lost a son. Yet I'm
hearing folks make insane comments like "We ought to
blast those Chinese," or "We can't let them get away
with that." How many of our sons will we have to bury
if we allow these wretches to drag us into yet another
war?

Remember, there is something called a just war. Fighting
as mercenaries for the usurpers in Washington does not
fit that category.




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to