-Caveat Lector- i thought there was more humour in you than there apparently is bb and it seems i didn't make the satire or sarcasm bold enough for you to see, my mistake. ----- Original Message ----- From: "BB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 3:39 AM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Dead Chinese fighter pilot footage > -Caveat Lector- > > No, I will agree to no such absurd, preposterous thing. > It is not negligent to land one's aircraft to save 24 lives, > it is only common sense, and international law provides for > such emergencies. I keep making this point, you keep not > reading. international law is all well and fine- but my point remains- they shuld have sealanded the craft and bailed to stop it gettig into chinese hands and to avoid the resulting diplomatic coup that china has since enjoyed. > > You do not "effectively" give your military aircraft to an enemy > simply because you were forced to land there in order to save your > life, they should have bailed. >especially since the aircraft was rendered inoperable how do you make that out? by the > reckless joy ridings of a hot-shot jet jockey showing off. no- not showing off- if you read the article it explained that it is a common practice to buzz spyplanes, during the cold war it was done on both sides. neither side actually fire on each other, so stay within int. law. what would america do if chinese spyplanes were off san fransisco? i read a washington times piece that was wetting it's knickers because of an increase in activitiy by china off the chinese coast LOL so i doubt that military manouvers would be tolerated by america. in fact- how would america react if one of china's allies were to station 100,000 men just on your doorstep? cuba say? you would fuck them up in hours. yet america have 100,000 in japan. > International law provides that such a landing NOT BE PUNISHED, > due to the overriding consideration of the emergency. I made that > point before also, apparently to little avail. to no avail because it just doesn't wash... international law bows down before public opinion. china won the propaganda war of that incident. maybe not within america- but outside it for sure. > > I really couldn't care less how china could show us how to deal > with traitors it was irony, bb, america is second only to china in the league table of domestic, civilian executions so i don't really think america needs any lessons in executing- but those yellow ribbons really pissed me off. -- those uncivilized, murderous brutes are viscious > animals when it comes to dealing with human beings. erm... can i just mention the policing of the seattle anti WTO demonstrations? very civilised indeed. As far as > executing their crew, I doubt it a great deal -- they did not execute > their second pilot participating in the harassment, he didn't give a plane to the yanks, so why execute him? and they all but > named the deceased a national hero for his ridiculous antics which > cost his life, a Chinese aircraft, and an American aircraft, along with > a great deal of intelligence hardware and data, and compromised military > secrets. you are confused- he is a national hero because he brough down an aircraft that was spying on his mother country. his sacrifice was worthy. and they are hardly going to execute him (if he lived) for knocking out an american aircraft and allowing the chinese army to have a gander at it are they? why do you think that the chinese authorities would punish him for compromising american secrets? ;) > > I really do not know why you hate us American types so much, i don't- i just think that having only the one superpower is unbalancing- it creates situations in the world where america thinks it can act with impunity. like i said- if the reverse situation happened then america would be horrified that china was being so evil as to spy on you so closely. deny that if you can. > you must not forget that as allies, your country benefits from the > surveillance and data gathered as well as the rest of the free world. no- we get data that suits america- do not dress it up as some sort of recipricol thing- unless it suits america. the missile defence crapola is a great example... for it to work stations are needed in the UK- but it won't protect the UK- only america. fuck that for a laugh. > > Let me give you one small insight into the mind and humanity of > the Chinese government you admire so much, seen on NBC news > about one month ago. > > > NOW, you want to "induce siezures in" yourself, get a look at that > brutal treatment of a human being, being administered by the > bragging, bellicose "inheritors of 5000 years of history." rodney king? how many equivielnat atrocities commited in the free world would you like me to scrape up? <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
