http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0625-04.htm



Published on Monday, June 25, 2001 in the Minneapolis Star Tribune

Hidden Details of Bush's Agenda

by Tom Teepen


ATLANTA -- There's a potentially juicy confrontation brewing between the
White House and the government's General Accounting Office. If it comes to
pass -- or, rather, impasse -- root for the bureaucrats on this one.

GAO, the government watchdog agency, has asked the Bush administration for a
list of the persons who had input into Vice President Dick Cheney's National
Energy Policy Development Group -- the ad hoc task force that ginned up the
plan the president announced in mid-May.

That was the drill-and-burn, SUVs-rule program that Bush announced before he
ran off to a couple of national parks to tree-hug as a photo-op
environmentalist.

Some congressional Democrats, especially Rep. Henry Waxman, ranking member of
the House Government Reform Committee, suspect the plan was drawn by energy
industry executives and lobbyists, including major political donors.

Energy industries gave nearly $49 million to GOP candidates in the last
election, $2.85 million to the Bush campaign. That was more than three times
the tribute paid Democrats.

Now trade groups are ponying up to join a jury-rigged Alliance for Energy and
Economic Growth to push for enactment of the Bush policy, under the
admonition of one key lobbyist that "the White House will have a long memory"
about businesses that don't buy in.

What has been missing from the overall picture are the specific names of the
persons the task force listened to and, on the surface evidence, harkened to.

Cheney's office is taking the position that there is no legal basis for GAO's
request and that, anyway, the task force was private and none of the
government's or the public's business.

And there it stands for now. We shall see.

Meantime, there's a curious aside to all this. There's no public outcry about
conspiracy and secrecy. You have to excavate the inside pages of newspapers,
and then only the big ones, for even a hint of the issue.

How different from the similar situation when Hillary Clinton was working up
a plan for universal health coverage for the Clinton administration. You
would have thought some evil coup was afoot -- and in that case without even
the potential for paying off political contributors behind the closed doors.

The Clintons complained about a "Republican attack machine." Their gripe was
sloughed off as sour grapes, but in fact there is a manifest double standard
at work.

Not only is Cheney's dodg iness going largely unremarked. There has been no
stink raised about the fact that Karl Rove, Bush's right-hand man, met with
Intel executives who were seeking federal approval for a merger, then sold
his slumped Intel stock at a get-well price after the merger was approved.

Lesser provocations than these during the Clinton administration produced
instant congressional hearings and sent floods of talking-point e-mails and
faxes to the ready mouths of the nation's informal but lockstep network of
conservative talk radio.

There may or may not be a scandal gap between the Bush and Clinton
administrations in the long run, but already it is clear that there is a huge
gap in scandal-mongering.


Reply via email to