-Caveat Lector- ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: The Occult Technology of Power (Part IV of IV) > Message-ID: <qST37.1247$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 09:00:06 GMT > NNTP-Posting-Host: 148.59.19.49 > X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Trace: nntp.msen.com 995101206 148.59.19.49 (Sat, 14 Jul 2001 05:00:06 EDT) > NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 05:00:06 EDT > Organization: Msen, Inc. > Lines: 720 > > > Subject: The Occult Technology of Power (Part IV of IV) > > A-albionic Research Up-date of 11-11-94: The Occult Technology of Power > (Part IV of IV) > ******Contents******** > > 1. The Occult Technology of Power by the "Transcriber" (Part IV of IV) > > 2. Flame and Flame Response > > 3. A Word from Our Sponsor > > ********************** > > > The > > Occult > > Technology > > of > > Power > > ********** > > A Project of the > Society for Illuminating > the Sources of Power > > ********** > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > The Occult Technology > of Power, 64 page Paperback Edition $8.95 + $3.95 p & h > Copyright 1974 > > All Rights Reserved for Printed Editions > E-text editions may be distributed without limit > as long as the address of the Copyright Holder > or publisher is included. Print-outs from e-text > are not allowed. > > Published by: > > A-albionic Research > PO Box 20273 > Ferndale, Michigan 48034 > > ISBN 0-55950-009-3 > > Library of Congress > Card Catalog Number 88-083670 > > For further information, sources, comments, & discussion write: > > A-albionic Research [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > THE TRANSCRIPTS > > My Introduction to your Initiation > > 1. Professor A. on the Role of Fraud in Nature > > 2. Professor Q. on Occult Knowledge as > the Key to Power > > 3. Professor M. on the Economics of > Central Banking > > 4. Professor B. on the Functions of the Central > Bank in the Mature Finance Capitalist System > > 5. Professor G. on Social and Business Legislation > and Policy > > 6. Professor D. on the Role of Public Education > > 7. Professor X. on Prestigious Associations and > Secret Societies > > 8. Professor Y. on Covert Operations > and Intelligence > > My Closing Remarks > > Afterword by the Transcriber > > Sources: > > Indispensable Thoughts on History, Economics, Politics, > Philosophy, and Human Nature > > The Left on the Ruling Class > > The Right on the Conspiracy Theory of History > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > **8** > PROFESSOR Y. ON COVERT > OPERATIONS AND INTELLIGENCE > > > In our fully developed state-capitalist systems we have found absolute > control of governmental intelligence gathering and covert operations to be > vital. > > Besides providing a valuable tool in our struggle with rival dynasties, > such control is now an integral and necessary part of our day to day > operations. Large intelligence communities are inevitable, given the > system of all encompassing governments which we have imposed upon the > world during our ascent to power. Our power would be short-lived indeed if > the pervasive influence and power of these iron-disciplined intelligence > agencies fell into the hands of mere politicians, especially those beyond > our control. > > We do not allow intelligence agencies to pursue the "national > interest," the way the public conceives "spies" to operate. Politicians > cannot be permitted to divert the power and influence of our intelligence > community from the esoteric requirements of our Money Power to petty > political struggles. > > Neither nationalistic aspirations of races and peoples nor ideological > visions of intellectuals for humanity can be allowed to pervert > intelligence and covert operations. Our rationalizations, both within the > intelligence community and to the public at large, must be diverse and > flexible, but the intelligence community must further without exception > the inexorable goals we have set for humanity. > > No crisis is more serious for our Money Power than an attempt by a head > of government to assume personal control of intelligence and operations or > to by-pass existing agencies by setting up parallel ones. Such intrusions > must be met decisively. Although a contrived scandal to remove the > offending politician from office is the first line of defense, we dare not > shrink from assassination when necessary. > > Perhaps the most accurate overview of our intelligence community can be > achieved by visualizing it as a "nationalized secret society." Our > predecessors, in their struggle against the old order of kings and > princes, had to finance secret societies such as the Illuminati, Masons, > German Union, etc. out of their own pockets. > > At great expense and risk such secret societies were able to infiltrate > the major governmental and private institutions of the nations that our > noble predecessors targeted for take over by the Money Power. Such > bureaucratic take-overs are expensive and time consuming. They can be > considered complete only when promotions, raises, and advancements are no > longer based on objective service to the stated organizational objectives, > but are in the hands of the infiltrating group and its secret goals. > > How much easier it is for us, the inheritors of a fully developed > state- capitalist system! By appealing to "national security" we are able > to finance and erect secret societies of a colossal scope, far beyond the > wildest dreams of our path breaking predecessors. Besides the benefits of > public financing reaped by these "nationalized secret societies," we > obtain a decisive advantage from the fact that these our "spook" > operations are sanctioned by law! > > Maintaining discipline, loyalty, and secrecy is no longer solely a > matter of propaganda, blackmail, patronage, and intimidation. Although > these remain important tools, especially in emergency cases, ordinary > discipline among initiates (now called agents) can be encouraged by > appealing to patriotism and can be enforced in courts of law by > prosecuting "national security violations." > > As massive as our intelligence community has become in itself, we still > operate strictly on the finance capitalist principle of leverage. Just as > a rational finance capitalist never owns more stock in a corporation than > the bare minimum required for control, intelligence operatives are placed > only in as many key positions as are required to control the target > organizations. Our goal, after all, is agent control of all significant > organizations, not intelligence community member ship for the entire > population. > > The organizational pattern of baffling "circles within circles," > characteristic of classical secret societies, is retained and refined by > our intelligence community. That "one hand not know what the other is > doing" is essential to the success of our operations. In most cases, we do > not allow the operatives themselves to know the ultimate, and when > possible, even the short-range objectives of their assignments. > > They operate under "covers" that disguise our goals not only from the > public and target groups, but from the agents themselves. For instance, > many agents operating under "left cover" are led to believe that the > agency, or at least their department, is secretly, but sincerely motivated > by socialistic ideology. Thus, they assume that the intelligence agency's > ultimate goal is to guide left-wing groups in "productive" directions, > even though they cannot always see how their own assignment fits into > those assumed goals. > > Other "left-cover" agents, those with right-wing predilections, are > encouraged to believe the agency is simply "monitoring" violence prone, > subversive groups in order to protect the public. When such agents are > asked to participate in or even lead radical activity they assume that the > ultimate objective is to fully infiltrate and destroy the organization for > the good of the country. This is very seldom the case. We waste little or > no money protecting the "public" or defending the "nation." > > Agents operating under "right-cover" are handled in symmetrical > fashion. Agents with right-wing prejudices are encouraged to believe the > agency is right-wing. Left-prejudiced agents are asked to operate under > "right- cover" in order to "monitor" dangerous rightist organizations. > Most intelligence agents remain blithely ignorant of the big picture which > is so clear to us from our spectacular vantage point. Very few have enough > information or intelligence to reason out how their specific and sometimes > baffling assignments promote the legislative, judicial, operational and > propaganda needs of our Money Power. Most would never try. They are paid > too much to think about such things. > > Agents with a "gangster-cover" are of two types. First, there is the > sincere gangster that draws his salary from an intelligence agency. He b > led to believe that the gangland "Godfathers" control the government > agency for their own purposes. Actually, the situation is the opposite. > The agency controls the gangster for other purposes. Second, is the > sincere crime fighter who is led to believe that the agency is at tempting > to infiltrate and monitor the gangsters as a preliminary step to > destroying organized crime. Such "upstanding" agents commit many crimes in > their zeal to rid the country of organized crime! > > To envision how we operate in this lucrative field, let's briefly look > at the mechanics of dope smuggling. Police and customs officials are told > to leave certain gangsters alone, even when transporting suspicious > cargoes. This is made to seem perfectly proper since it is well known that > secret police infiltrators of organized crime must participate in crimes > in order to gain the confidence of gangsters. > > What customs agent would want to upset a carefully laid plan to > "set-up" the underworld kingpins of dope pushing! But the agent, as well > as the police who cooperate, are mistaken in believing that the purpose of > the assignment to help smuggle dope is ultimately to smash organized > crime. If he could see the big picture, as we can, the agent would see > that practically all our dope is smuggled by federal intelligence agents > and secret police! How ever could such a volume be transported safely? > Real harassment and prosecution is reserved for those who enter the field > without our approval. > > Here is our organized crime strategy: On the one hand we pass laws to > ensure that mankind's favorite pastimes (vices) are illegal. On the other > hand, we cater to these "vices" at a huge monopoly profit with complete > immunity from prosecution. > > A new and growing methodology of our intelligence community is psycho > and drug-controlled agents. Properly, these are referred to as "behavior > modified" agents, or, in the vernacular, "zombies." With the use of > hypnotic drugs, brain washing, sensory deprivation, small group > "sensitivity" training, and other behavior modification techniques, the > scope of which was hinted in the movie "Clockwork Orange," complete > personalities can be manufactured from scratch, to the specifications of > value structure profiles we design by computer to suit our purposes. Such > personalities are quite neurotic and unstable due to defects in our still > developing technology, but still useful for many purposes. > > The primary virtue of "zombies," of course, is loyalty. Agents that are > subconsciously programmed for the assignment at hand cannot be conscious > traitors. All a "zombie" can do is reveal how compulsive and psychotic he > is with regard to his "cause." Even to trained psychologists he simply > appears to be the proverbial "lone nut." Although the "zombie" may have > memories of psychotherapy at a government agency when questioned under > hypnosis, this is unlikely to raise suspicion in the mind of > court-appointed psychologists. After all, "lone nuts" should be kept in > insane asylums and subjected to psychotherapy! At most, the government > hospital will be reprimanded for letting a loony loose before he was > cured. > > Until our techniques can be perfected the use of "zombies" must be > restricted to "national dramas" designed to justify the growing power of > our centralized governments over the lives of our people. Most suicidal > radicals and "crazies" who so mysteriously avoid arrest for years at a > time are "zombies" conditioned to terrorize the public in the name of some > irrational ideology. After repeated doses of such terror, the public is > conditioned to accept the necessity of our intrusive police- state with > very little objection. > > The way is clear for an accelerated program of behavior modification > research to be conducted mostly at public expense in the name of mental > health and rehabilitation. Such research can be conducted with little > complaint in prisons, refugee camps, drug rehabilitation centers, > government hospitals, veterans hospitals, and even public schools and day > care centers. Mental institutions, methadone maintenance centers, and > prisons are fertile fields for recruiting the deranged or drug addicted > persons most suitable for "zombie" conversions. Of course, only a few of > our most trusted agents actually participate in the creation of "zombies." > The brilliant researchers and experimenters who make most of the > break-throughs earnestly believe that their techniques are destined > strictly for the betterment of mankind. > > Inevitably, a fraction of the population objects to behavior > modification as an infringement of man's "sacred" free-will even if they > are convinced that our intentions are benign. We carefully leak a few > scandals to satisfy such persons that our experiments are being kept > within bounds and that excesses are being stopped. Our artificial scandals > exposing the "excesses" of coercive psychology are carefully designed to > make the researchers seem incompetent and clumsy to the point of maiming > and killing their "patients." This effectively conceals the fantastic > strides we have made toward total behavioral control. Great things are > going to be possible in the future. > > > > > MY CLOSING REMARKS > > > My son, you surely have many questions about my strategy in the > seemingly momentous economic and political crises that are shaking > national and international affairs. You and I will begin handling them in > detail shortly. For tonight, let me be brief. Most of the current national > upheavals are stage-managed to consolidate our monopoly position in > government and business against the continual nuisance of economically > competent, but politically naive competitors. Likewise, most international > crises are managed to exert pressure on our obstreperous, reluctant puppet > dictators in underdeveloped areas. These events are fairly easy to manage. > I expect to place such management in your hands as soon as possible. > > The real challenge lies in dealing with my international peers. These > are the real crises since they are crises of my power structure, not just > of my subject populations and puppets. In the vast chess game with my > peers there are no rules and no proven tactics. Mutual vulnerability, > alone, limits the conflict. My peers and I have labored for decades to > erect a world government and banking system under which we could all share > finance capitalism's millennium without the nightmare of internecine > warfare. With the advent of nuclear war a new world order seemed > particularly desirable. I say ostensibly we have labored for world > government because none of us are sure the others will ever voluntarily > surrender sovereignty to the group. The schedule set after the last World > War has not been met. So far, the world government idea has served mainly > to enthuse collectivist intellectuals, and secondarily to veil each > finance capitalist's maneuvers for supremacy from the rest. > > The future course of finance capitalism is difficult to predict. Our > empires are too fragile to risk all-out battles for supremacy among > ourselves. Our power would dissipate to second echelon wealthy during the > struggle. Yet we continue to chip away at rival empires on the premise > that offense is the best defense. On the other hand, purely political > leaders are helpless before our money power. When Caesars arise, they are > of our making. > > Perhaps our system will simply remain much as it is, secure on the > national level and disturbingly pluralistic at the international level, > until reason and egoism have developed among our populations to such an > extent that our occult technology of money power becomes obvious to all > who think and must yield to either anarchy or a more advanced form of > deception > > > > > "The names of some of these banking families are > familiar to all of us and should be more so. They in- > clude Baring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, > Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, > and above all Rothschild and Morgan." > --Dr. Carroll Quigley > Tragedy and Hope > > > AFTERWORD > > BY THE TRANSCRIBER > > Any resemblance of these characters to persons living or > dead is purely coincidental. Any resemblance of their meth- > odology to that of real ruling elites is purely intentional. The > extent to which I represent or exaggerate the self-conscious, > intentional power technology of real politico-economic rulers > and their unity is for the reader to decide after studying > available empirical evidence. > > I am providing a bibliography of relevant historical works > to aid the curious reader. I have included no works written > from spurious pluralistic suppositions no one seems to > consider pluralism as a proposition requiring evidence since > they are flooding the market. Unfortunately, many works > listed affirm that ideas rather than individual struggles for > wealth and power propel history; that is, they view the elites > they observe ruling the world as ideologically motivated. > Thus we have the spectacle of the Right claiming that major > finance capitalists such as the Rockefellers or Rothschilds are > "communist" conspirators or "socialists." On the other hand, > we see the I,Left claiming that the same people are bent on > imposing laissez -faire capitalism, or in a slightly more > realistic vein, are fanatical proponents of fascism. Virulent > white racism is another ideology foolishly ascribed to the > ruling class by the Left. This opinion is nicely balanced by > the charge from the Right that the elite wants to "mongrel- > ize" and thus submerge the white race. As usual the elite, > completely free of prejudice, supports both sides of this > battle for its own ends. > > As should be clear by now, I believe that finance capital- > ists (Ferdinand Lundberg has dubbed them finpols, or > financial politicians) are understandably attempting to make > their power as extensive as possible without incurring the > severe risks which plague pubpols (public politicians). > (It seems that only the most daring finpols are willing to take > on the additional risks of pubpoldom, perhaps only because > they are denied the reins to the family's fortune by more > privileged relatives.) Pubpols lose their privacy and thus > their right to sexual impropriety in addition to incurring vul- > nerability to electioneering and worse in "democratic" coun- > tries. In most areas of the world the lot of the pubpols is > even worse. Purge, assassination, and armed coup are regu- > lar events. While totalitarianism of Right or Left at home > eliminates the shield of secure private property desired by > finpols, laissez--faire is likewise rejected out-of-hand as hell- > on-earth by enlightened power-seekers. > > Egoism, mitigated only by the reality of circumstance, is > the motive to realistically attribute to healthy elites. An elite > under the spell of mental spooks could not hold sway for > long. Although finpol statism is increasingly a crisis for its > victims, there is as yet no evidence that the elite itself is in > serious crisis. Even inflation, the current crisis for the > powerless, is simply another crisis to be managed toward the > end of consolidating, extending, and refreshing elite power. > No doubt the depression which must inevitably follow will be > managed to even better effect at the expense of the masses. > > I have classified the bibliography into the categories Right > and Left. In each list I begin with the most objective works > and proceed to the works most infected with mental spooks > and emotional hysteria. These books should be read for > empirical data, not theoretical insight. A list of less ideologi- > cally biased works is provided as well. I quote and recom- > mend authors, not to imply support for my scenario where > there is none, but to credit a few of those who have provided > grist for my thoughts. > > > > > "We are much beholden to Machiavelli and others, > that write what men do, and not what they ought to do. > > -Francis Bacon > > > > Indispensable Thoughts on History, Economics, Politics, > Philosophy, and Human Nature. > > Murray N. Rothbard, Economic Determinism and the Con- > spiracy Theory of History Revisited, Audio-Forum. > America's Great Depression, Nash, 1972. > > Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope Macmillan, 1966 > > Gabriel Kolko, The Triumph of Conservatism, Quadrangle > > Carroll Quigley, The Evolution of Civilizations. > > Anton Szandor LaVey, The Satanic Bible, Avon Books, 1969. > > Arkon Daraul, Secret Societies, Citadel Press, 1962. > > Count Egon Caesar Corti, The Rise of the House of Roths- > child, The Reign of the House of Rothschild, Cosmopolitan > Book Corp., 1928. > > Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own, Libertarian Book Club, > 1963. > > Robert Ardrey, The Social Contract, Dell Publishing, 1970. > > Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a > Philosophy of the Future, Random House, 1966. > > George Orwell, Animal Farm, New American Library > > Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, Encyclopedia Britannica, > 1955. > > Ludwig von Mises, Theory and History, Arlington House, > 1969. Human Action, Henry Regnery, 1966. > > James J. Martin, Revisionist Viewpoints, Ralph Myles Pub- > lisher, 1971. > > Committee on Government Operations-U.S. Senate, Dis- > closure of Corporate Ownership, U.S. Government Print- > ing Office, 1974. > > Antony C. Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, > Wall Street and FDR, Arlington House, 1975. > > > > The Left on the Ruling Class > > Gabriel Kolko, The Triumph of Conservatism, Quadrangle > Books, 1967. > > Richard Ney, The Will Street Gang, Praeger Publishers, > 1974. > > Ferdinand Lundberg, The Rich and the Super-Rich, Lyle > Stuart, 1968. America's 60 Families, Vanguard, 1938. > > William G. Domhoff, Who Rules America? Prentice Hall, > 1967. The Higher Circles. Random House, 1970. > > Matthew Josephson, Money Lords, New American Library, > 1973. The Robber Barons. Harcourt Brace & Co., 1934. > > George H. Shibley, The Money Question, Stable Money Pub- > lishing Co., 1896. > > Jules Archer, The Plot to Seize the White House, Hawthorn > Books, 1973. > > William Hoffman. David: Report on a Rockefeller, Dell Pub- > lishing, 1972. > > Joel Andreas, The Incredible Rocky, North American Con- > gress on Latin America, 1973. > > Gustavus Myers, The History of the Great American Fortunes > 1907 > > > > The Right on the Conspiracy Theory of History > > Antony C. Sutton, National Suicide, Arlington House, 1973. > > Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., The Economic Pinch, Dorrance & > Company, Inc., 1923, Reprinted by Omni Publications. > > Louis T. McFadden, Collective Speeches of Congressman > McFadden, Omni Publications, 1970. > > H.S. Kenan, The Federal Reserve Bank, The Noontide Press, > 1968. > > Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy , Concord Press, > 1973. Richard Nixon - The Man Behind the Mask, > Western Islands, 1971. The Rockefeller File, '76 Press, > 1976. > > Dan Smoot, The Invisible Government, The Dan Smoot Re- > port, Inc., 1962. > > W. Cleon Skousen, The Naked Capitalist, The Author, 1970. > > Taylor Caldwell, Captains and Kings, Fawcett Publications, > 1973. > > John Robison, Proofs of Conspiracy, 1798, Reprinted by > Western Islands. > > Nesta Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, > Christian Book Club, 1967. > > A. N. Field, The Truth About the Slump, 1931, Reprinted by > Omni Publications, 1962. > > William Robert Plumme, The Untold History, The Committee > for the Restoration of the Republic, 1964. > > June Grem, Karl Marx: Capitalist, Enterprise Publications, > 1972. > > Emanuel Josephson, Rockefeller Internationalist: Man Who > Misrules the World, Chedney Press, 1962. > > > 2. Flame and Flame Response! > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Subject: Re: Reply to J. Daugherty > > Ron! Why not make specific responses to what you disagree with.... > > Certainly it is valid to make criticism of groups, whether they be > Masons, Catholics, British, etc. as long as it is understood that the > criticism apply to alleged policies of those groups, not each an every > individual that comprises those groups. > > For instance, I am an American, but I don't feel hurt whenever someone > criticises what America has done. > > You really should try participating on specifics instead of just assuming > I'm a bigot. Come on...let's have a discussion here. > > You are also confused in thinking that everytime I or another conspiracy > theorist claims that a group has power, we are condemning that group. > That is not necessarily the case at all....we may be merely describing > objective geopolitical power relationships. You really need to read a > lot more carefully! > > You claim below that I routinely "attack" several groups. In the absence > of an example, I must consider your remark intentional slander. I think > you are going to have to start being a lot more careful, especially when > you are under suspicion for have delivered a mail bomb to hundreds of > innocent people. > > On Wed, 16 Nov 1994, Ron Boutwell wrote: > > > > > Earlier J. Daugherty of A-Albionic said this in PRJ WEEKLY (Weakly would be > > more appropriate): > > > > > > "2. Flame and Flame Response > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Many of you have asked how Ron Boutwell got your name for his silly > > flame of The Occult Technology Power reprinted below. I suppose he did a > > "who" of the List, which is legal. Those who do not want to receive his > > materials should simply ask him to remove you from his list. Complaining > > to me will be of no use. > > > > This the same Ron Boutwell who "accidently" bombed prj_weekly > > with 42 Megs of graphics files. I cannot be sure if it was an > > accident or not! His attitude sure makes it difficult to believe > > his claims of innocence." > > > > > > James, > > > > First, if you had the least shred of objectivity after writing that first > > paragraph you would have to admit that if my criticisms of your "Occult > > Technology of Power" can accurately be considered a flame, so should your > > PRJ WEEKLY be considered a weekly flame since you routinely attack several > > groups that could very easily be innocent of the charges you level since any > > evidence (though very little usually) you present is tenuous, questionable, > > and circumstantial at best. Oh, I forgot, you never actually say it is > > fact. You hide behind journalistic word games by using the word "alledged" > > quite liberally. Masons alledgedly did this, or Jews alledgedly did that. > > Wow, what a big difference that REALLY makes in the message. In all > > fairness do you think your diatribes should be immune to the same criticisms > > you so eagerly level against groups you often know nothing conclusive about > > yet presume guilty even after sometimes being proven innocent? I restate, > > if my criticisms of your diatribes qualify as flames, well it takes a > > flame-thrower to know one dosn't it? I find it odd that when you spew > > criticisms they are to be considered as mere information being distributed > > to the masses, but if someone critiques you, it is a flame. That's odd > > James. Are you even the least bit objective? You know, I have at least as > > much proof that you only do this nonsense to sell books as you have that > > Jews are trying to take over the world (or Rockafellers, Bildebergs, > > Illuminists, or Masons). I suppose it should be a forgone conclusion that > > my theory is correct about you since your theories are to be treated as such > > regardless of who your words hurt unjustifiably. But that's ok, the > > important thing is that you collect $12.00 for a copy of some ill-sourced book. > > > > And in light of your obvious lack of conscience as demonstrated by your > > unwarranted attacks on people that you know nothing about I could care less > > if you think the graphics file incident was accidental or not. I see no > > reason why a man who maligns without a conscience should be treated with > > conscience. I did care before, but not any more so in regards to your > > statement, " I cannot be sure if it was an accident or not! His attitude > > sure makes it difficult to believe his claims of innocence." I can only > > say, who gives a rats ass whether you believe it or not? Any bombs you may > > recieve are only a fractional by comparison to the word bombs you attack > > innocent groups with on a weekly basis. I was actually sorry enough to > > amass a list of subscribers and apologize for that incident. I even > > apologized to you. Strange thing is, upon reflection, I am no longer sorry > > for doing it to YOU (I still apologize to your subscribers). YOU are a > > dispicable man without conscience and YOU ALONE deserve any inconvenience > > such problems cause you. Since it was in fact an accident though I would > > suspect it was a case of "what goes around, comes around" that caused you > > that little problem. > > > > > > 3. And Now a Word from Our Sponsor > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > A Note On Recommended Reading--Please Read Carefully!! > > The books, reports, and articles recommended are not without serious > faults from the point-of-view of the Project, the Quarterly Journal of > A-albionic Research. Most are guilty of blatant partisan bias, too often > on the basis of ideology, religion, race, class, interest group, etc. > Unfortunately, by its nature, ruling class research is not and probably > never will be solely the province of disinterested scholars. However, > keep in mind that the bootlicking, lying court historians cultivate only > the appearance of objectivity and, therefore, deserve even less credit > than some of the partisan authors we have recommended. > > The Project hypothesis is unique in ruling class-conspiracy literature. > None of the authors recommended present the Project theory. The > recommended reading simply contributes facts, research leads, evidence, > testimony, insights, theorizing, and speculation relevant to the Project's > progress toward uncovering the objective nature of the ruling class- > conspiracy(s) or power organism(s). > > Do not judge the Project theory by the readings recommended. We recommend > many authors not for objective information, but for insight into the > propaganda of the social power organism which holds them in thrall. > > For the evolving Project theory consult only the Project back issues, > especially the August 1985 Issue ($9.00) for the original theory and the > Winter- Spring 1989-90 Issue ($9.00) for a major revision of working > hypothesis. Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms > Discussion List, not necessarily endorsed by: > *********************************** > James Daugherty, Internet Postmaster for A-albionic Research (POB 20273, > Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the > entire political-ideological spectrum. Quarterly journal, book sales, > rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date > Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources. > To Discuss Ideas: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msen.com/~lloyd/ > For Ordering Info & Free Catalog: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a-albionic.com/formaddress.html > For Discussion List: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > text in body: subscribe prj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ** > Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html> > Every Diet Has Failed! What Can I do? > Click Below to "Ask Dr. Kathleen"! > http://www.radiantdiet.com/cgi-bin/slim/deliver.cgi?ask-1364 > *********************************** <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
