-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

>
> 0065.  C-141 crew airlifts detainees to Guantanamo Bay
>
> WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFPN) -- An Air Force Reserve
> Command aircrew from the 445th Airlift Wing here delivered the first
> Taliban and al-Qaida detainees to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on Jan. 11.
>
> The all-volunteer aircrew transported 20 detainees to Cuba aboard a C-141
> Starlifter aircraft, a long-range troop and cargo plane.  The crew
> returned home Jan. 13.
>
> Besides reservists from here, C-141 aircrews and aircraft maintainers from
> the 452nd Air Mobility Wing, March Air Reserve Base, Calif.; and the 459th
> AW, Andrews Air Force Base, Md., took part in the operation.  Other
> reservists participating were from the 440th AW's airlift control element,
> from Gen. Mitchell International Airport Air Reserve Station, Wis., and
> security forces from around the command.
>
> For security reasons, the names of the airmen are not releasable, but
> crewmembers shared their impressions of the first flight of its kind for
> Operation Enduring Freedom.
>
> "It was nothing like any normal mission, but the same rules apply as with
> any flight" said one of the loadmasters, a senior master sergeant.  "You
> do what you do as safely as possible."
>
> The mission demanded teamwork, not only among the aircrew but also among
> Air Force security forces, including several airmen from the 445th
> Security Forces Squadron assigned to the flight to manage the movement of
> the detainees.
>
> "The main difference was the cargo," said the pilot, a lieutenant colonel
> with nearly 20 years' experience in C-141s.  "Nobody relaxed, but I had no
> concerns on the airplane.  Security measures were rock solid."
>
> This crew's flight, which took place four months to the day after the
> Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, was the first of many.  Facilities for up to
> 2,000 detainees are being built at Guantanamo Bay.
>
> The Guantanamo Bay detention facility will house hard-core terrorists,
> those who have demonstrated a willingness to escape, take their own lives
> or kill others, said Defense Department sources.  Locking up the
> terrorists supports the global war on terrorism.
>
> Guantanamo Bay was judged to be the "least worst option," providing a safe
> environment to secure the detainees, said Secretary of Defense Donald
> Rumsfeld.
>
> While not officially prisoners of war, the detainees are being accorded
> the same treatment.  Consequently, access to or observation of them might
> be considered an indignity.
>
> Because of security concerns, details about specific movements of the
> detainees, as well as security measures, are not being released publicly.
> (Courtesy of AFRC News Service)
>
>
>
> 0068.  CSAF: Air Force, Navy working relationship 'never better'
>
> by Tech. Sgt. Tim Dougherty
> Air Force Print News
>
> WASHINGTON -- Some of the greatest rivalries are between athletic teams
> from the service academies.  However, during the current battle against
> terrorism, cooperation between the Air Force and Navy has never been
> better, said Gen. John P. Jumper, Air Force chief of staff.
>
> "The component relationships in this war, especially between the Air Force
> and the Navy, are better than I have ever seen," Jumper said.  He would
> know, since he has been "up close and personal for the last 10 years in
> some senior positions, and very close to the battle."
>
> Since Oct. 7, the bombs that have been raining down on Afghanistan --
> dropped by Navy and Air Force aircraft -- all have one thing in common:
> they have brought an end to the Taliban control of Afghanistan.
>
> "We're putting together [our] nation's [warfighting] capabilities exactly
> the way we bought them," Jumper said. "You use the capabilities you need."
>
> Navy and Air Force airplanes are being used in ways that have never been
> used before.
>
> "We are inventing these tactics more or less in the course of battle so we
> can get this job done for (U.S. Central Command Commander) General Tommy
> Franks and his team," Jumper said.  "We're using carrier-based naval air,
> and the Air Force is coming across long, vast stretches of airspace to put
> bombers in there. The B-52 (Stratofortresses) take off and don't know what
> their targets are going to be until they arrive."
>
> Adm. Vern Clark, the chief of naval operations, agrees with Jumper and
> said they both are big believers in the joint efforts of the Air Force and
> Navy. The two leaders have been working together for many years. Clark
> recalls a specific discussion in 1994 during Operation Vigilant Eagle in
> Southeast Asia, when Jumper was the Joint Force Air Component Commander
> with Clark as his deputy.
>
> "John looked at me and told me to make sure the carrier knows we're not
> counting sorties. We're not in competition here," Clark said.
>
> "We have been and are working together to create the best warfighting
> capability and the best warfighting response," he said.
>
>
>
> 0067.  Survey focuses on organizational climate
>
> by Tech. Sgt. Mark Kinkade
> Air Force Print News
>
> SAN ANTONIO -- For the first time since its launch in 1997, the Air Force
> chief of staff survey will focus solely on organizational climate issues.
>
> The survey will be available online Jan. 22 to March 8 and has been
> redesigned to gauge what Air Force people think about management and
> work-related topics. The 1997and 1999 versions of the survey also asked
> respondents about quality-of-life issues in the service.
>
> "Based on previous feedback, we've significantly improved this year's
> survey," said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper. "The size of
> the survey has been cut in half, focusing entirely on issues such as
> leadership and supervision, job characteristics, resources, values,
> communication, training, teamwork, and recognition."
>
> The survey will help define the Air Force of the future, and has adopted
> the motto "Speak Today, Shape Tomorrow" to encourage as many people as
> possible to take the 45-minute survey, officials said.
>
> Quality-of-life issues are addressed in a separate survey, said officials
> with the survey development team at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
>
> Previous surveys resulted in a series of changes at all levels of the Air
> Force.
>
> For example, following the 1999 survey, Electronic Systems Command
> officials decided to drop an initiative that would have converted 54
> military positions at Hanscom AFB, Mass., to civilian jobs after military
> people at the base raised concerns about extensive additional duties. The
> survey was also the catalyst for increasing Hanscom's military presence by
> 10 percent.
>
> Also, a host of bases improved or added recognition programs after survey
> results were sent to commanders. Many bases developed additional
> leadership programs for both officers and enlisted people, and commanders
> worldwide launched several organization streamlining programs to reduce
> inefficiencies in their commands.
>
> Officials said the survey is useless unless people participate and
> commanders follow up on results.
>
> "At this time, we need the vector check on the health of our organizations
> and leadership our people can provide," Jumper said. "To achieve valid
> results, we absolutely need maximum participation."
>
> The survey Web site is available at http://csafsurvey.af.mil
>
>
>
> 0066.  Government travelers can keep perks for personal use
>
> RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE, Texas (AFPN) -- People who travel at government
> expense can now keep the perks they earn for personal use.
>
> A change to Section 1116 of the Fiscal 2002 National Defense Authorization
> Act allows travelers to keep benefits, said S. W. Westbrook, director of
> the Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.  The benefits
> include points or miles, upgrades, access to carrier clubs or facilities,
> or other promotional items
>
> The act was signed into law by President Bush on Dec. 28, and the change
> went into effect Dec. 31.
>
> The policy applies to promotional items received before, on or after Dec.
> 31, Westbrook said.  The material must be obtained under the same terms as
> those offered to the general public and must be at no additional
> government cost.
>
> One example is the voluntary relinquishing of a seat on an airliner.
> Under the policy change, a traveler may keep payments from a carrier for
> vacating a seat; however, no additional expenses, such as per diem, may be
> paid as a result of the traveler's delay.
>
> "Additional travel expenses incurred as a result of voluntarily giving up
> a seat are the traveler's financial responsibility," Westbrook said.
>
> When a traveler is involuntarily denied a seat, the traveler enters
> "awaiting transportation" travel status for per diem and miscellaneous
> expense reimbursement.  In that case, any monetary compensation, including
> meal and lodging vouchers, belongs to the government.  (Courtesy of Air
> Force Personnel Center News Service)
>
>
>
> 0064.  Officers asked to provide input into assignment process
>
> RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE, Texas (AFPN) -- Air Force Personnel Center
> officials here are asking officers to provide online feedback about the
> officer assignment process through a survey being e-mailed Jan. 15 to more
> than 15,000 people.
>
> The survey is the second opportunity for officers to give formal feedback
> to the personnel center since the assignment system's inception in 1998.
>
> Those who receive the e-mail will be asked to click on a Web link and
> answer 29 general questions and give insight about the effectiveness of
> the Air Force assignment system and its associated technology. The survey,
> planned for every two years, gives personnel officials a way to monitor
> officers' attitudes about the assignments process.
>
> There is also a separate portion of the survey only for commanders. It
> includes 23 questions about the effectiveness of the AFAS from a
> commander's viewpoint. The commander's questions will help determine if
> the AFAS is placing the right officer in the right job, personnel
> officials said.
>
> More than two-thirds of the current officer force has already been
> assigned through AFAS, said Capt. Patricia Rodriguez-Rey, chief of
> assignment procedures here. "We are interested in making AFAS the best
> possible assignments system. Any feedback given by those participating
> will be valuable into making this happen."
>
> An AFAS review group will convene here March 4 to 8 to discuss the
> findings, compare the feedback with previous survey results and make
> suggestions to policy-makers at the Pentagon.
>
> Questions about the survey can be directed to AFPC at (210) 565-4098, or
> DSN 665-4098.   (Courtesy of AFPC News Service)
>
>
>
> 0061.  World War II hero tells his 'war story'
>
> by 2nd Lt. Justin Giovannettone
> 11th Wing Public Affairs
>
> BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE, D.C. (AFPN) -- On June 28, 1942, U.S. Army Lt.
> Thomas Griffin received the Distinguished Flying Cross in front of Hangar
> One here for his participation in the legendary Doolittle Raid against
> Japan.
>
> Almost 60 years later, Griffin returned here recently to appear on the Fox
> Network television program "War Stories with Oliver North" and recount the
> story of the United States' first offensive action against the Japanese
> homeland in World War II.
>
> The 85-year-old Griffin said the base looks a lot different from how he
> remembers it.  Back in 1942, Bolling still had an operational airfield and
> was the general headquarters of the Army Air Forces.
>
> Griffin, who retired at the end of the war as a major, belonged to the
> 17th Bomb Group, based at Pendleton, Ore., in early 1942.  When the call
> came asking for volunteers for an unspecified secret mission, almost the
> entire group volunteered.  The next few months were spent training for the
> unheard of task of flying B-25 Mitchell bombers off an aircraft carrier
> for a one-way trip into history.
>
> The plan was for 16 B-25 bombers, led by Lt. Col. James "Jimmy" Doolittle,
> to be transported aboard the aircraft carrier USS Hornet to within 400
> miles of the Japanese coast.  The bombers would than take off and bomb
> major Japanese industrial cities including its capital, Tokyo.  Though the
> raids were not expected to cause significant damage, the fact that the
> mission would hit mainland Japan less than five months after Pearl Harbor
> was to be a major psychological victory for the Americans.
>
> But there were major risks involved.
>
> Before the Hornet could get within the planned range of the Japanese
> coast, it came in contact with several Japanese picket ships.  Fearing the
> ships would transmit their location to the Japanese fleet, Vice Admiral
> William F. Halsey, commander of the task force escorting the Hornet,
> ordered Doolittle and his raiders into the air immediately.  They were
> about 250 miles farther than their planned takeoff range.
>
> Another concern was the aircraft itself.
>
> "No one had ever taken a fully loaded B-25B off a carrier until we did it
> that day," recalled Griffin. "We were 1,500 pounds over what the book said
> [the B-25] could carry."
>
> Nonetheless, all 16 B-25s, including Griffin's No. 9 plane, made it off
> the carrier successfully.
>
> As the navigator for his crew, Griffin remembers guiding the plane on its
> four-hour flight to Tokyo and flying so low he could see the rooftops of
> houses as they reached the city.
>
> "The Japanese planes shooting at us were not accurate because they were
> not used to shooting at bombers that low," he said.
>
> He also remembers flying right over the Japanese emperor's palace and that
> the crews were given explicit instructions not to hit the palace because
> the emperor was considered divine by the Japanese people and U.S. leaders
> did not think it wise to target him.
>
> Griffin's B-25 was supposed to drop its bombs on a tank factory in Tokyo.
> After directing the plane over the target, Griffin was sure they had hit
> it.  It was not until several years later that he learned they had
> actually missed the tank factory and instead hit an electricity generation
> plant -- temporarily turning out the lights in parts of Tokyo.
>
> The mission was a success, but the danger was not over for Griffin's plane
> or for the other 15 B-25s that had flown over Japan that day.
>
> Though the B-25s were able to take off from the Hornet, trying to land all
> 16 back on the carrier was not an option, even if they did have enough
> fuel to make it back.  So the plan was to keep on flying into allied
> Chinese territory and land at friendly airfields.
>
> But because they were forced to take off early, none of the planes were
> able to make it to the airfields.  Most flew as far as they could into
> China and then bailed out.
>
> "It didn't take any bravery to jump out of the airplane . . . because if
> you stayed in, you were dead," Griffin said.  The crews were never
> formally trained in parachuting, they were just told, "When you bail out,
> count to eight and pull the cord."
>
> Griffin and his crew were eventually recovered by friendly Chinese
> soldiers and returned to U.S. forces.  But some of the Doolittle raiders
> were not so lucky.  Though none were shot down over Japan, three died in
> accidents and eight were captured by the Japanese.  Three of the captured
> men were eventually executed, one died in captivity and the others
> returned home after the end of the war.
>
> The war was not over for Griffin though.
>
> After receiving his DFC at Bolling Field here, he returned to battle --
> this time in the Mediterranean theater.  In July 1943, he was shot down
> over Sicily and captured by the German army.  He spent the rest of the war
> as a prisoner and says the Germans treated him surprisingly well.
>
> "In two years of being a prisoner, not one German ever laid a hand on me,"
> Griffin said.
>
> When asked about the similarities between the World War II and America's
> current war, Griffin said that the war against terrorism, like World War
> II, is a clear struggle between good and evil.  He also said that the
> American public's outrage since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11 is
> similar to the public's attitude after the bombing of Pearl Harbor on Dec.
> 7, 1941.


*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
Write to same address to be off lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to