> > Even so the HASC concluded it was probably the result of a
> >conspiracy.
>
> Probably? On what do you base this assumption?
Actually it was an incomplete but direct quote. The 716 page report is
on-line and here is the page where you'll find the quote:
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/report/html/HSCA_Report_0016a.htm
Section 1C
The Committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that
president John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a
conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the
extent of the conspiracy.
Very good! I'd be more satisfied with a link to a government server through FOIA, but this will do. That's all I ask for, you know: some kind of evidence. Now, if we could just find something on the prior, and specific, awareness of the Bush (Clinton? :-)) administration regarding the events of 9-11. As we are all aware, there is now more than enough evidence to show that FDR knew about the planned Pearl Harbor invasion before it occurred, so surely we could "put our heads together" and find something similar for Cynthia McKinney to work use :-)
For what it's worth, I voted NO ("I think officials knew it was coming.") on the AJC poll. I am also aware that, should the poll results favor Ms. McKinney's opinion, the poll will be taken down almost immediately. I suggest saving the page to disk and/or taking screen shots for posterity :-)
To Xxx, Yyy:
Boy, do you sound like a newbie when it comes to conspiracy research.
Actually, I've been studying conspiracy theories since about 1993, and have been on this list almost that long.
It's
the kindest thing one can say after reading your end of the dialogue.
I know, I know. I've committed a mortal sin among conspiracy theorists; I've asked for evidence. :-)
Edward ><+>
If you have fifty problems and one of them is government, you have only one problem.
http://www.global-connector.com/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reality_pump/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
