EDWARD

Evidence: the material or, in certain instances, anecdotal indication of the existence of postulate fact in which either cannot be disputed by reasonable objective analysis or is otherwise acquired by objective (casual) observation.

well that certainly fits the known sumerian archaeology, indian, chinese, south american and european ethnological
evidence of beliefs and artefacts and other collected anecdotes from the 17 -19 century that substantiate reptoid civilisation.
you plead ignorance of the supporting facts for the reptoid thesis edward. yet there is a global museum full of
reptoid references; material, anecdotal, objective and non-human. How do you rationally explain this empirical data ?
lets get philosophy of science then ....
How do you manage to refute the conjecture that the mountain of reptilian artefacts and ethnological evidence points
to the existence of a reptilian species on this planet ???
What reason do you have to dismiss the more than obvious data ???
I really want to understand.
There's me and my chickens and gerbils - and you with the ostriches and dinosaurs
 
lets have one of your allegedly reasonable objective analysis of the known reptilian thesis
- and frequent references to david icke wont be your get out here - lets deal with just the
known facts - I want to see your rational mind at work here.
 
What irrationally propels you to discount the known obvious empirical data and
artefacts for reptilian civilisation - and don't be afraid to gimme philosophy of science,
and all them rational stuff coz me and ma gerbils iz intae epistemology.
 
andrew hennessey
www.trans4rm.co.uk  [ps. educated in scotland]

Reply via email to