Ok, since you appear to be serious this time, let's take this from the top--again.
Evidence: the material or, in certain instances, anecdotal indication of the existence of postulate fact in which either cannot be disputed by reasonable objective analysis or is otherwise acquired by objective (casual) observation.well that certainly fits the known sumerian archaeology,
Then you can cite examples (URLS to objective materials will do) of either reptilian cultural artifacts or of the remains of transgenic/xenomorphic life forms which do not fall within any terran phylogeny, AND which clearly depart from any known "humanoid" genome (e.g, Neanderthal, Homo Sapiens or any other primate in general).
indian, chinese, south american and european ethnological
evidence of beliefs and artefacts and other collected anecdotes from the 17 -19 century that substantiate reptoid civilisation.
Likewise here, but I would only accept *multiple* (two or more) vicarious accounts of the *same phenomena* from the mythology/folklore of differing cultures as adequate anecdotal evidence--provided that all accounts are published side by side for comparison (for example, multiple accounts from differing cultures of the great flood).
you plead ignorance of the supporting facts
What supporting facts? I've seen none thus far. I've seen tons of speculation on the basis of remotely similar cultural anecdotes, but no facts. Here's your chance to convince me.
for the reptoid thesis edward.
That's just it. I've seen multiple theses, but no evidence to back any of them up.
yet there is a global museum full of
reptoid references; material, anecdotal, objective and non-human.
Such as? I'm sure you could pop out a URL to some really good source. A page put up by some high school kid on Geocities doesn't count :-)
How do you rationally explain this empirical data ?
Such as?
lets get philosophy of science then ....
How do you manage to refute the conjecture that the mountain of reptilian artefacts and ethnological evidence points to the existence of a reptilian species on this planet ???
I don't "refute" it any longer. Quite honestly, after an initial--fruitless--search for rational information on the subject, I consigned the whole business to being the work of cheap shills who wanted nothing more than to sell books to sc-fi buffs. I then discovered that people were actually taking this nonsense seriously.
What reason do you have to dismiss the more than obvious data ???
Simple: I've seen NO data.
lets have one of your allegedly reasonable objective analysis of the known reptilian thesis
- and frequent references to david icke wont be your get out here - lets deal with just the
known facts - I want to see your rational mind at work here.
OK, provide some facts, and we'll go from there.
What irrationally propels you to discount the known obvious empirical data and
artefacts for reptilian civilisation
Uh, maybe the absence of "known, obvious, empirical data" "propels" me. :-)
- and don't be afraid to gimme philosophy of science,
and all them rational stuff coz me and ma gerbils iz intae epistemology.
andrew hennessey
www.trans4rm.co.uk [ps. educated in scotland]
Educated in Scotland as what? :-)
BTW, while you're rustling up the facts, could you please change the background image on your page? It sure would make the text easier to read :-)
Edward ><+>
"I'm not paranoid. I just wear this foil hat to keep the
government mind control rays from penetrating my skull."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
