-Caveat Lector- The D.E.A. and others would then use these new employees to unilaterally start-up false and fabricated conversations with Plaintiff’s wife and others for the purpose to discredit, frame, and destroy Plaintiff’s reputation as an individual and his business with the intent to cause Plaintiff to go into bankruptcy personally and business-wise. All of this was straticized and tactically formulated and implemented against Plaintiff to destroy him in order to cover up their illegal and corrupt criminal activities under color of office, authority, and law. All of this was done intentionally and willfully, also in direct violation of their oaths of office and in violation of the Ethics in Government Act, which was strictly binding on each of them. It is important for this court to understand that the allegations herein asserted by Plaintiff against the D.E.A.’s illegal and corrupt activities have already been adjudicated before the Arizona Federal District Court in trial before the Honorable Judge Lacey in favor of Plaintiff. This resulted in the favorable “acquittal” of Plaintiff, which the D.E.A. appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and lost. The Appellate Court sustained the verdict of acquittal in favor of Plaintiff. The Honorable Judge Lacey, upon the conclusion of the trial, literally pounded on his bench desk and screamed loudly at the D.E.A. agents for committing “perjury” and “fabrication of evidence” and “obstruction of justice” by them and staunchly demanded they be arrested and charged for their contemptuous conduct on the above denoted grounds. The judge powerfully exclaimed the conduct was unacceptable “outrageous conduct of the United States against Charles Schlund.” Plaintiff’s lawsuit may very well lead to the connection and disclosure of Judge Broomfield’s involvement with the illicit sexual relations with Plaintiff’s wife, Kathy Schlund, who was a high ranking member of the terrorist organization known as the Aryan Brotherhood. She was also the sexual mistress of Bruce Babbit many years before, who was also an associate of the Aryan Brotherhood. When Plaintiff read the Don Bolles Paper in 1977, all of the corrupt judges were listed in The Bolles Papers read by Plaintiff. The papers included the names and annotations of both corrupt and non-corrupt judges. The corrupt judges were earmarked for appointment to the bench (state and/or federal positions) after they were each politically sanitized for such appointments. Plaintiff alleges that without exception, every time he talks or writes about Judge Broomfield or Judge Copple to anyone, he is intentionally tortured and satanically physically and emotionally punished in the most despicable manner. Plaintiff has also been repeatedly threatened with death by murder if Plaintiff continues to talk about, write about, or expose the abovesaid judges through Plaintiff’s litigation against the government for such acts and conduct, which are continuous and ongoing, torturously depriving Plaintiff of his human rights. On information and belief and on those grounds, Plaintiff alleges if Judge Broomfield or/and Judge Copple have issued any warrants relating to the continuous investigation(s) of Plaintiff between 1977 through present, such warrants were based on lies, fabricated evidence, committed subordination of perjury, and conspired in the aforesaid for the purpose of using such corrupt acts under color of office, authority, and law. Plaintiff has asserted other details of his personal knowledge in a previous Motion for Recusal of Judge Broomfield filed with the court. Despite the facts, the judge unilaterally denied the recusal (of him) motion and, in effect, ordered that he shall determine the case. Then he aided and abetted the government’s acts of fabricating statements of facts and then accepted such activity for the intentional purpose of creating a stage for the termination of the lawsuit on the government’s skeleton two-page Motion for Summary Judgment on the only known appellate case judicially created for that specific purpose of prematurely cutting off the Plaintiff’s right to a jury trial on genuine issues of substantive material facts. Plaintiff alleges further that Judge Bloomfield continuously failed and refused to render findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rules 52 and 56, despite such continuous requests by Plaintiff were in complete compliance with all such procedural rules in writing and never waived. The court is requested to take judicial notice of this fact. (F.R.E. 201). Plaintiff alleges Judge Broomfield or other officers of relation with the court, influenced by him, had Plaintiff repeatedly tortured to the point of near death and deprived of thousands of nights of sleep until Plaintiff was forced under such circumstances to make untruthful, outspoken statements for the purpose of reducing the level of torture activity imposed on him for such purposes. Also, in exchange for Plaintiff’s relief from torture and to allow him to sleep, Plaintiff agreed to make certain outspoken statements for the D.E.A., serving its purposes of fabricating such statements while preserving certain statements and strategically purging other statements of Plaintiff, designing a “statement profile” which is then used to justify the continuing investigation of Plaintiff for the last 24 years since his acquittal as stated herein. While under torture and constant sleep deprivation and the threat of death, and after calling and writing the D.O.J., F.B.I., D.E.A., I.R.S., C.I.A., N.R.A., S.S., Glendale and Phoenix police departments, Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department, and numerous other law enforcement offices, with Plaintiff demanding the torture to stop, he agreed to give fabricated statements to the D.E.A. and others in exchange for sleep and relief from said torture. Despite every attempt to stop the government’s evil and satanic infliction of torture on Plaintiff, he was forced to agree to give the D.E.A. untruthful statements in exchange for relief from torture. Plaintiff would offer the D.E.A. statements for relief of torture during these torture sessions on him by the D.E.A. Plaintiff had read the D.E.A.’s records in The Bolles Papers and, therefore, knew what type of and content of said statements the D.E.A. needed. Plaintiff would offer the D.E.A. untruthful statements as follows: a. “I’m framing that honest and honorable Judge Broomfield. He’s such a legitimate and courageous judge.” b. Likewise as to the above relating to Judge Copple, O’Conner, or any other person I knew of that was under the protection of the D.E.A. that Plaintiff supplied information to the F.B.I. on as abovesaid. c. The same untruthful statements related to drug-related information: “I have a mobile speed lab.” “I am running a mobile speed lab.” “The heroin shipment is in.” “The speed shipment will be in tonight.” These conversations were between the Plaintiff and the D.E.A. and those operating the monitoring devices after the D.E.A. and others agreed to instantaneously terminate the torture Plaintiff if he would agree to have such conversations with the D.E.A. and others. If Plaintiff refused to do what he agreed to as stated above, the torture would instantaneously resume until Plaintiff actually complied with giving such statements to the D.E.A. and others, whereupon he would be allowed to sleep and the torture would be terminated. The D.E.A. and/or others would then sanitize these said conversations by deleting what Plaintiff previously said, as well as after them, to serve the D.E.A.’s corrupt and fraudulent purposes. Such statements would then be submitted to the courts to give a false presentation the appearance of being a legitimate statement placing the Plaintiff in false light before corrupt judges.
All individuals who participated knowingly in the above statements, except those working openly or covertly with the government and those under their influence, will testify truthfully that the government’s activities are similar to those of unethical, unscrupulous, and lawless individuals. All of the witnesses will testify to all of the above-denoted facts. Plaintiff alleges that the D.E.A.’s “statement profiling” serves the “judicial case profiling” purposes of using the judicial system procedures to prematurely cut off the constitutional rights of due process and the rights of discovery and to a trial by jury related to said corrupt governmental activities. Plaintiff alleges that after obtaining such false conversations under torture and sleep deprivation and the threat of death, that the D.E.A. and/or others did submit such conversations to the court under perjury after cutting off the first part of the conversation and cutting off the end of the conversation. This was done in part to protect Broomfield from Plaintiff’s testimony. No legitimate judge in any American judicial system can refuse to hear a motion for relief from torture, factually supported and supported with accurate legal authority such as Plaintiff’s [Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072 (9th Cir. 1986)]. Plaintiff submitted a detailed affidavit of the who, what, why, when, and where of the nature and degree of the emotional and physical pain experienced by Plaintiff during these constant episodes of torture impelled on him. In fact, any time that Plaintiff mentions Judge Broomfield, Judges Copple, Sandra Day O’Conner, or any other person which was stated in The Bolles Paper, he is subjected to the most sever and excruciating physical and emotional punishment. Such a degree of pain and suffering imposed on a human being is classified as “torture” under both state and federal law. Such acts and conduct are clearly within the “Protection Against Torture Act” and forbidden under international and federal law of the United States, as more fully described herein. The type of torture inflicted on Plaintiff is the most horrible form of torture that can be inflicted upon the Plaintiff while allowing him to survive until the next day so Plaintiff can then be further tortured. If the degree of torture was any heavier, Plaintiff would not survive. Plaintiff is being kept barely alive for the sole purpose of being further tortured the next day. This manner of torture is being done under the authority of corrupt and evil judges by corrupt and evil agents for the purpose of setting an example of what will happen to any witnesses trying to expose or testify against said corrupt judges/agents of the government. Judge Broomfield’s repeated denials of Plaintiff’s motion for relief from such torture here resulted in the slow and horrible death of Plaintiff ultimately, as well as other extreme injuries and health conditions. Due to the severe sleep deprivation caused by the horrible sounds and other torture modes from the implants, Plaintiff has lost thousands of nights of sleep. The effect of such sleep deprivation has caused Plaintiff to lose millions of dollars in business profits due to the permanent and crippling effect of the torture and sleep deprivation. It also resulted in the physical collapse of Plaintiff’s body. It also resulted in Plaintiff becoming a Type II Diabetic in addition to suffering from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Plaintiff’s blood pressure went from an average of 120 to 213 the instant the government turns on or otherwise activates the unique C.I.A. design “torture” modes which are different than the monitoring modes of which the implants are capable and causes Plaintiff’s body to violently react, such as his blood pressure increasing from an average count of 120 to 213. During heavy torture sessions, Plaintiff’s blood pressure increased much higher. This has also resulted in permanent damage to Plaintiff’s internal organs, eyes, and his nervous system. These effects have been experienced by Plaintiff who has been under continuous medical treatment and who will now need to remain so for the rest of his miserable life. Plaintiff estimates his life span has been shortened by at least 20 years. During extremely heavy torture sessions by the use of the implants injected or installed in Plaintiff’s neck or/and ears and now possibly other locations, the torture raised Plaintiff’s blood pressure so high it resulted in the bursting of the blood vessels in his eyes, causing temporary blindness. During these extremely heavy torture sessions, Plaintiff would be vomiting and shitting his pants uncontrollably. During other extremely heavy torture sessions when Plaintiff was tortured all throughout the night, every night, year after year, he would spend the nights screaming in agony, shitting in his bed, vomiting, and in convulsions. During these torture sessions, all night long as they tortured Plaintiff, he would telephone the D.E.A. and called them over a thousand times, and the D.E.A. tortured Plaintiff in the most satanical and evil ways to protect Judge Broomfield, Judge Copple, George Bush, Sr., and others that Plaintiff was supplying the F.B.I. information on. Plaintiff has in his possession a large number of these taped conversations between himself and the D.E.A. and D.O.J. which have not been removed yet by the aforesaid under the color of another fabricated warrant. The government and courts fully knows that warrants are issued daily all across America to inject or install electronic devices in such citizens’ beloved pets, and in them as well. This is done for the purpose of monitoring conversation in investigations, and corrupt judges and agents know that this gives them the opportunity to electronically torture and control witnesses against them, such as political witnesses such as Plaintiff. Without the use of such electronic devices, it would be impossible for corrupt judges, politicians, police officers, and other law enforcement personnel and others to threaten, torture, and murder the witnesses against them under the color of law involving surreal and fantastic investigations which in reality are cover-up activities of their corrupt and political criminal activities. Plaintiff has read the contents of hundreds of warrants denoted above which were obviously classified files of the Department of Justice relating to such investigations. These files had been removed from the D.O.J. under the orders of George Bush, Sr. to cover up the monitoring, torturing, and assassinations of political witnesses and dissidents in the United States of America. This also included the use of such technology and devices against non-corrupt judges, federal agents, and congressman/senators and other persons and entities. Judge Broomfield’s intentional refusal or failure to hear Plaintiff’s motion for relief of torture was because the judge knew Plaintiff was a witness against him for corruption. This has also resulted in the slow murder of Plaintiff, and he will die from the damages caused to him by the government and the government’s refusal to remove the implants from him. The government and the courts have never acknowledged in any case that the technology exists to implant and torture a person with such technology. It has only acknowledged and admitted it has the technolog(ies) to grossly and excessively violate person(s) constitutional rights to privacy. Pursuant to the federal court’s ruling, in its federal rule decision in Doran v. McGinness, 158 F.R.D. 383 (1994), the court committed fraud in the ruling of this case as the court has no intent of allowing any litigant a jury trial to prove such implant and technology exists which can be used to torture a person such as a political witness, Plaintiff. Stated another way, a corrupt judge will intentionally and deliberately use his judicial power in a despicable way to prevent Plaintiff through pretextual procedural justifications, which are meritless in fact, of proving in reality that wireless technology coupled with implants commonly in use at present for monitoring (surveillance) of individuals can be used also to directly physically and emotionally torture the individual in the most heinous and cold-hearted way. The net effect of such evil and fraudulent activities by such a perverted and unethically dishonorable judge is to thwart the pursuit of the truth by Plaintiff by prematurely killing his right to prove the technology exists by asserting or accepting fabricated facts to serve its intended purpose of fashioning a clever decision with the appearance it was rationally created to serve the ends of justice. Such result is as fraudulent and deceptive as the torturous effect of depriving the person of his constitutional rights under color of authority. DEMAND FOR DEMONSTRATION THAT TECHNOLOGY TO TORTURE A PERSON EXISTS. Plaintiff hereby requests the court to set a date certain before any dismissal or judgment is entered in this case for he and his experts to demonstrate the said technology exists. Plaintiff can easily prove and will that wireless technology did in fact make quantum leaps in advancement and will display to a non-corrupt judge tangible and scientific evidence that (1) wireless implants exists, (2) wireless technology exists which can be used independently from such implants or in conjunction with other electronic technology, (3) to intrinsically violate rights to privacy under almost any conditions and almost any place, (4) human voice and other information is inherently transmitted unfiltered by the infringing parties, and (5) wireless implants can be used with such electronic technology to actually torture, hurt the feelings of the person in a depraved manner and/or have the harassing effect of a torturous pattern of conduct disturbing the protected peace of mind and torturing the person. As of 1992 and through the present, Plaintiff supplied detailed information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) of the names of the most evil and corrupt judges who were specifically appointed to the bench to fix certain cases for the Aryan Brotherhood, D.E.A., C.I.A. and corporations under their influence and protection. Plaintiff’s wife, Kathy Schlund, was ordered by the D.E.A., and she did comply with such orders of the D.E.A., to organize orgies, etc. for them and supply females for the sexual pleasure of corrupt judges and others. Plaintiff alleges on information and belief that Judge Broomfield will be assigned to this case and will fix this case so it is terminated in order to further the cover-up of Broomfield’s corrupt and illegal judicial activities. In 1990, one of the many covert operations the D.E.A. conducted against Plaintiff was to cover up the information Plaintiff had against them and to discredit Plaintiff. It unfolded as follows: Plaintiff’s ex-wife, Kathy Schlund, remarried in 1997 and known as Kathy From (she is now divorced), continued to work with the D.E.A. in their covert operations against Plaintiff. In fact, the D.E.A. used Kathy Schlund and their surveillance cameras to generate, fabricate, and create evidence to discredit me as a political witness against the D.E.A. and others. Kathy Schlund worked directly under Agent Wood at the D.E.A., who at the time was running illegal operations from his position in the D.E.A. The D.E.A. had decided it would be necessary to discredit Plaintiff as a political witness because they knew there was never any chance of directing Plaintiff into a position where he would every become a member of their satanic organization. This fact forced the D.E.A. to create a false picture that Plaintiff had read his D.E.A. files and didn’t disagree with the contents. The D.E.A., the Dirty Dozen, and my wife, Kathy, conducted this covert operation to create the fictional belief to the observer that Plaintiff asked, received, read, and agreed with the contents of said files, knowing Plaintiff did not do the aforesaid. Kathy?s brother, George Griffith, asked Plaintiff if he would like his D.E.A. files, that he could get them for Plaintiff for free. Plaintiff responded, ?For free? Sure.? Plaintiff also told him he ?would like to see what is in them if they are free.? George Griffith told Plaintiff he could do this through some ?other guy?s case? that Plaintiff didn?t know. Plaintiff then told other people he was going to get his D.E.A. files for free. Later, Plaintiff asked George Griffith if he was still going to get the files, and George Griffith said ?Yes.? Plaintiff never heard back from George Griffith and never did anything knowingly to get his files. The D.E.A. then set up Plaintiff to give the false impression that he solicited and received his files. This covert operation was conducted by Kathy Schlund, working for the D.E.A. and at the direction of the D.E.A., to discredit Plaintiff as a political witness. Kathy Schlund believed she would be killed if she did not participate in this covert operation, as ordered by the D.E.A. The first step of this covert operation phase was to get Plaintiff to unknowingly sign the request form. At this point in time, the D.E.A. was torturing Plaintiff satanically with a bugging device(s) that, as a result of long exposure, caused an Auto Immune condition known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (leaving Plaintiff 85% or more mentally disabled), a condition that is now well known and documented. This condition has and continues to severely disable Plaintiff. Plaintiff believes the D.E.A. or others under the D.E.A.?s control and direction then gave Kathy Schlund the required governmental authorization forms to be signed by Plaintiff. They had Kathy Schlund put it in with all the other unrelated business forms that Plaintiff had to sign that month relating to his business. Kathy would review these forms and have Plaintiff sign them; this was part of the partnership they had. If Plaintiff signed a F.O.I.A. form for the D.E.A. it was unknown to him what exactly he was signing, and the D.E.A. would not have maintained sound and a video of it because the D.E.A. knew that Plaintiff was not knowingly signing the form. The D.E.A. would have only taken a picture of the signing to use as fabricated evidence against Plaintiff. There can be no video and audio of Plaintiff understanding what the document was or knowingly signing this paper. To conduct this covert operation, the D.E.A. would have had to make this look like some kind of form rather than a letter. After the D.E.A. completed this phase of their covert operation against Plaintiff, they then used Kathy Schlund again for the completion of the next phase. In this next phase of their covert operation which was conducted at Kathy?s mom?s house, Kathy handed Plaintiff a large envelope address to Plaintiff and asked Plaintiff to take this out and put it in the car. Plaintiff asked Kathy what was in the envelope, and she told him it was papers for her brother?s (George Griffith) appeal. Plaintiff then asked Kathy why it was addressed to him. Kathy replied that her brother had to have someone to send it to. Because her answer to my question of concern seemed legitimate, I agreed to put the envelope in the car. Plaintiff took the envelope and placed it on the back seat, as requested by his wife, Kathy Schlund. At this time the D.E.A. again created fabricated evidence by photographing Plaintiff doing this, furthering the illusion. Kathy contemporaneously asked Plaintiff to pull the car out into the street from the driveway, which later Plaintiff realized served their intended purpose of furthering the illusion that Plaintiff was driving away with his purported files allegedly supplied by the D.E.A. Immediately afterwards, Plaintiff pulled the car into the street, parked it, and swiftly returned to the house and ate dinner. Upon leaving, Plaintiff asked Kathy where this envelope was. Kathy replied she had put it in the trunk of the car. We then proceeded home. A few days later when Plaintiff was leaving for work and had to look in the schedule book on his desk, he saw there was a pile of papers on the desk and asked Kathy what these papers were. Kathy replied they were her brother’s papers for his appeal. She told Plaintiff he could look at them if he wanted to. Plaintiff quickly reviewed these papers. The D.E.A. could not have taken a video and sound of this, because this would prove Plaintiff didn’t know what the papers really were. No papers were blacked out, as in F.O.I.A. files. The D.E.A. had direct knowledge during these ongoing events that Plaintiff had never knowingly requested or knowingly received Plaintiff?s files. Later that week Kathy handed Plaintiff a blue garbage bag that had been tied up and asked him to carry it out to the trash. Plaintiff told her to do it herself, and she replied that it had to be done right now, before the garbage men came. Plaintiff protested, but rather than fight with her, he carried out the garbage bag. The D.E.A. again allegedly began taking photos of Plaintiff, attempting to create fabricated evidence that Plaintiff was now throwing away his files. During this time period, Plaintiff had no idea that any of these setup activities were ongoing by the D.E.A. Later, after Kathy and Plaintiff had broken up and were divorced, Kathy started telling Plaintiff, over the telephone, what the fabricated evidence was that was in his D.E.A. files. The F.B.I., who the Plaintiff had gone to and requested to be monitored, was taping this conversation. Plaintiff asked Kathy how she could have read his D.E.A. files, since Plaintiff knew he had never knowingly requested or received any such files. This phone call led Plaintiff to discover how the D.E.A. conducted their covert operation to frame him and generated fabricated and created evidence that he had knowingly requested, received, and disposed of his D.E.A. files. The D.E.A. and/or other co-conspirators injected Kathy Schlund with C.I.A. designed monitoring and torture devices in order to threaten, intimidate, and torture her to control and manage her, with the intent of covering up their covert operations. These acts were covert acts to obstruct justice and threaten her as a witness under color of law and color of authority. All of which was illegally done. After this all took place, Plaintiff requested his files, and the D.E.A. has and continues to deny him this evidence. The purpose of this denial is to deprive Plaintiff of evidence needed to show how the D.E.A. conducted its illegal covert operations to frame Plaintiff as a drug manufacturer. This evidence is necessary as direct evidence in support of this lawsuit against the D.E.A. and is being denied to Plaintiff in order to obstruct justice and delay his trial against the D.E.A. This conspiracy is part of the cover-up of the assassination of John F. Kennedy and must be stopped so the truth can become openly known. Plaintiff requested his D.E.A. files in 1978. The D.E.A. replied there were no such files relating to Plaintiff other than what they had turned over on the filming at Mike Joyce’s house. In 1989 or 1990 the D.E.A. framed Plaintiff to make it look as if he had requested his D.E.A. files and that he received, read, and disposed of them. This was all created, staged, orchestrated, and completed by the D.E.A. and others working for or subject to the control of the D.E.A. Later, in 1996, Plaintiff requested the D.E.A. files they claimed Plaintiff had already received and reviewed. The D.E.A. fully knew that this request under the F.O.I.A. is to obtain direct evidence needed to show in court how the D.E.A. fabricated all the evidence and committed perjury before the federal court to obtain false warrants to justify an illegal criminal investigation and the torture of Plaintiff to cover up the information he had against the D.E.A. and others, such as the corrupt federal and state judges. The federal court, using one of the corrupt judges Plaintiff had been supplying information to the F.B.I. about, threw Plaintiff’s lawsuit out in order to stop discovery, stopping the release of the evidence to Plaintiff in the release of his records. After the D.E.A. framed Plaintiff in a manner giving the appearance that he received all of his records pursuant to a fraudulent F.O.I.A. request, they created evidence to make it look like Plaintiff knowingly requested, received, read, and disposed of these fabricated D.E.A. documents. Plaintiff was intentionally set up and framed to make it look like he requested, received, read, and disposed of these fabricated documents consisting of hundreds of pages to discredit Plaintiff as a political witness to the D.E.A., C.I.A. and others connected to this organized crime network involved in drug activities and murder. Plaintiff’s wife, Kathy Schlund, conducted the setup of Plaintiff under the orders of Special Agent Wood of the D.E.A., who controlled the activities of the D.E.A. in Arizona. Also, Agent Wilkey of the D.E.A., was personally involved with said setting up of Plaintiff and made continuous and regular visits to Plaintiff’s residence to have illicit sexual relations with Plaintiff’s wife, Kathy Schlund, and to discuss with her the government’s plan to remove Plaintiff as a political witness. <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
