-Caveat Lector- This article from NYTimes.com has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Study Favors Different Tack on Smallpox July 9, 2002 By WILLIAM J. BROAD A new study finds large differences in how four different vaccination strategies would fight a smallpox terror attack, with the best allowing 440 deaths and the worst 110,000 deaths. The study used a mathematical model to compare how a smallpox attack on a large city that infected 1,000 people would progress when countered with diverse vaccination plans meant to halt the spread of the highly contagious disease. In all cases, mass vaccination of the United States population worked far better than limited, local immunizations, a strategy the federal government has tended to prefer. "We find that mass vaccination results in both far fewer deaths and much faster epidemic eradication," the authors concluded. In the best case, the hypothetical epidemic was halted in 115 days and in the worst, 350 days. The analysis, published this week in the online edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, was written by Edward H. Kaplan, a public health specialist at Yale University, and David L. Craft and Lawrence M. Wein, both of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Ever since smallpox was eradicated from human populations decades ago, federal officials have resisted mass vaccination because the vaccine uses a live virus that can cause severe side effects and even kill. In the days of widespread vaccination, roughly one person in a million receiving the vaccine died. But federal policy is in flux because of fears of bioterrorism. Although today only Russia and the United States are known to have stocks of the virus, experts say clandestine supplies probably exist. Most people are considered vulnerable to a smallpox attack because immunity is thought to wane over time. The United States stopped routine vaccinations in 1972. Smallpox kills roughly one in three victims who are unvaccinated. Vaccination can save even infected people: if given within four days of exposure to the virus, the vaccine halts the disease's advance. The new study, coming amid rising criticism of federal policy in recent months, claims to be the first to make detailed comparisons of the vaccination options. It expands on a presentation Dr. Kaplan gave last month in Washington. The study found the least effective method to be "ring vaccination," the primary way smallpox was eradicated from human populations. It consists of isolating infected patients and vaccinating people found to be in close contact with them, forming a ring of immunization around any outbreak and a barrier to its spread. In the hypothetical attack, ring vaccination allowed 367,000 cases of smallpox and 110,000 deaths and took 350 days to extinguish the outbreak. By contrast, mass vaccinations as soon as authorities became aware of a attack - it takes roughly two weeks for smallpox to incubate and a body to show symptoms - would result in 1,830 cases and 560 deaths within 115 days. The study found that if the authorities decided belatedly to switch from ring-to-mass vaccination on the 33rd day of the crisis, the effect would still be considerable, 15,570 cases and 4,680 deaths. "The cost of waiting," the authors said, "is very high - 4,120 incremental deaths." The study found that the vaccination of the United States population before an attack worked best of all to cut fatalities. If only 40 percent of the population were immunized before any such attack, the same attack followed by wider mass vaccinations would produce 440 deaths. But if followed with ring vaccinations, the result would be 40,000 deaths. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/09/health/09SMAL.html?ex=1027207028&ei=1&en=8d6aa14ab1ff07c4 HOW TO ADVERTISE --------------------------------- For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or other creative advertising opportunities with The New York Times on the Web, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo For general information about NYTimes.com, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
