-Caveat Lector-

>From URL @ bottom

Falwell's follies

Bill Berkowitz - WorkingForChange

10.16.02 - What do civil libertarians, gays, feminists, pro-choice advocates, pagans 
and
Muhammad have in common? Within the past year or so, they've all felt the verbal wrath 
of
the Rev. Jerry Falwell. For years, the Rev. Falwell's message of hate has been mostly a
domestic matter. His recent remarks on CBS' "60 Minutes" calling Muhammad a 
"terrorist,"
however, caused an immediate international commotion.

Last year, shortly after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the 
Pentagon,
the Rev. Falwell told Pat Robertson's "700 Club" audience that "… I really believe 
that the
pagans and the abortionists and the feminists and the gays and the lesbians who are
actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle... all of them who have tried to 
secularize
America. I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen.'"

Besieged by critics and perceived as being pretty damned nasty, the Rev. Falwell became
apologetic. Well… sort of. A few days after teeing off on the laundry list of his 
life-long
enemies, Falwell claimed that his comments were made "during a theological discussion 
on
a Christian television program [and they] were taken out of their context and 
reported, and
that my thoughts -- reduced to sound bites -- have detracted from the spirit of this 
time of
mourning." Like the politician who tells a racist joke and then claims he didn't know 
he was
being recorded, Falwell claimed his words were meant only for Christian true 
believers, and
not for the public at large. That excuse doesn't change the nature of his comments.

Falwell: 'Muhammad was a terrorist'

Flash forward nearly 13 months: On the October 6th edition of "60 Minutes," the Rev.
Falwell told CBS' Bob Simon: "I think Mohammed was a terrorist. I read enough by both
Muslims and non-Muslims, [to decide] that he was a violent man, a man of war. In my
opinion, Jesus set the example for love, as did Moses, and I think Mohammed set an
opposite example."

In short order, with critical comments against him mounting both at home and abroad,
Falwell claimed that he was a victim of sound bite journalism - the real culprit was 
that
Satanesque excuse for a journalist, Bob Simon.

The Rev. Falwell is no victim. His situation is in no way comparable for example to 
the time
Connie Chung ambushed Newt Gingrich's unsuspecting mother and got her to say some
nasty stuff on network television about Hillary Clinton. The Rev. Falwell is 
television-savvy;
he's been a guest on more television programs in a year than most all other religious
figures will appear on in a lifetime. On his website, the Rev. frequently informs the 
faithful
of his upcoming talking-head schedule.

Playing the "I was tricked" card, the Rev. Falwell told WORLD, the weekly evangelical 
news
magazine, that he "should have known" that CBS would use the comments "to stir up
conflict and animosity." It wasn't that his comments were hateful, the Rev. seemed to 
be
was saying. It was the fact that CBS would use them that was the problem.

According to Marvin Olasky, World's editor-in-chief, Falwell said that Simon "had 
called him
back once the uproar began, fishing for more, and that he had complained about CBS
extracting from 1 1/2 hours of interview tape that divisive side remark. 'I believe you
exploited me and took advantage of me as a person,' he told Mr. Simon, who quickly got 
off
the phone," Olasky reported.

Olasky rushed to Falwell's defense, and in his World column he declared Simon to be "a
bigot." Olasky claims that the segment on "60 Minutes" was meant to focus on Christians
and Israel, not Islam, "but Mr. Simon in passing asked Jerry Falwell if he thought
Muhammad approved of violence, and Mr. Falwell fell into the trap. CBS then promoted 60
Minutes with the 'terrorist' sound bite, in full knowledge that it was incidental to 
the thrust
of the piece. The evident goal: Hype the program, build the audience, and never mind 
the
lack of context."

Shooting off his mouth

The Rev. Falwell has made a career out of shooting off his mouth. It is only during 
these
past few years that his remarks have become part of the greater public discourse. 
Claiming
as he did that the television figure Tinky Winky was gay was one thing -- laughable 
for its
utter absurdity -- but branding the head of a religion a terrorist is a much more 
serious
matter.

On October 11, Canadian Press reported that at least five people were killed in Hindu-
Muslim rioting and police gunfire in western India. According to Canadian Press, "The
violence erupted during a general strike to protest remarks" by the Rev. Falwell. In 
Iran to
get that country's support for a tough UN resolution against Iraq, British Foreign 
Secretary
Jack Straw said he regarded Falwell's comments "as much an insult to me as a Christian 
as
they are to Muslims."

Finally, on Saturday, October 12, the Rev. Falwell issued an apology. According to 
Reuters,
the Rev. Falwell said he meant no disrespect to "any sincere, law- abiding Muslim." In 
a
prepared statement the Rev. Falwell said: "I sincerely apologize that certain 
statements of
mine made during an interview for CBS's '60 Minutes' were hurtful to the feelings of 
many
Muslims."

On October 14, the Associated Press reported that leaders in the two main branches of
Islam generously "welcomed" the apology. Falwell "deserves thanks for his return to the
righteous path," said Mohammed Sayed Tantawi, the grand sheik of Al-Azhar, a Sunni
Muslim mosque in Cairo.

In the Iranian city of Qom, an important Shiite Muslim center of learning, a 
high-ranking
cleric said Falwell had shown courage. "A person courageous enough to apologize for his
errors is worthy of praise," Ayatollah Hussein Mousavi Tabrizi told The Associated 
Press.
"It's humanitarian and good Islamic behavior to accept an apology from a person who
admits making a mistake."

As the editor of The Data Lounge pointed out on October 9, Falwell's statement has been
one link of the chain of anti-Muslim sentiment spewing forth from fundamentalist
preachers: "Pat Robertson… called the Prophet Muhammad "a wide-eyed fanatic" and "a
killer" and denounced Islam as "a monumental scam." Franklin Graham, son of evangelist
Billy Graham, claimed that Islam is "a very evil and wicked religion." The Rev. Jerry 
Vines,
past president of the Southern Baptist Convention, told an audience of several thousand
listeners at its annual conference that the Prophet Muhammad was "a demon-possessed
pedophile."

So how sincere was Falwell's latest apology? As of this writing, the Rev. had not yet
publicized either his comments or his apology at his official website, falwell.com.

Blaming the terrorist attacks in the U.S. on his political enemies and calling 
Muhammad a
terrorist is pure unadulterated Falwell. The Rev. drops a rhetorical bombshell, 
eventually
recognizes the damage he's done, and slips into full spin mode -- claiming 
victim-hood. And
if that doesn't work, he issues an apology. And while the Rev. Falwell's latest remarks
certainly add to his legacy of hate, Marvin Olasky's sprint to his defense indicates 
that the
Rev. will no doubt maintain his good standing amongst some of the brethren.

©Working Assets Online

URL: http://www.workingforchange.com/ article.cfm?itemid=13927&CFID=3154321
&CFTOKEN=19161214
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; I don't believe everything I read or send
(but that doesn't stop me from considering it; obviously SOMEBODY thinks it's 
important)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without 
charge or
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of 
information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to