-Caveat Lector-

http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/afn_articles/afn_iraq_pows.htm

>>>Let's see ... the FBI was better in 1992 than they were in 2001, better at finding 
>the
bogus people who found their way into the U.S. who had intentions of exacting 
retribution
for the wounds indflicted on their countries ... let's see ... the INS was better in 
1992 than
they were in 2001 ... A<>E<>R <<<


Iraq POWS Paid to Resettle in U.S.

Los Angeles Times August 24, 1993


By Richard A. Serrano


The United States has begun resettling in this country up to 4,000 Iraqi soldiers who
surrendered during the Persian Gulf War, an effort that has drawn criticism from a 
coalition
of congressmen who believe the prisoners are receiving special treatment never awarded
returning American soldiers.

The U.S. government is paying between $4,000 and $7,000 to relocate each of the enemy
prisoners -- and in some cases their family members. They have been classified as
refugees who would be harmed by Iraqi President Saddam Hussein if returned home.

The Iraqis are being scattered in small numbers to communities in California, Florida 
and
elsewhere where they will have access to job opportunities, housing and federal social
service programs. It is precisely that special consideration that has irked a 
bipartisan group
of 75 members of Congress who are urging President Clinton to deny the refugee status 
to
the Iraqi soldiers. "This is an incredibly bizarre set of priorities," said Rep. Cliff 
Stearns, a
Florida Republican who sits on the House Veterans Affairs Committee.

"This nation's priorities regarding war veterans should be focusing on those who 
served in
the American uniform, first and foremost," he said.

Added Rep. Earl Hutto (D-Fla.): "Given the choice, I would rather see that $4,000 go 
to one
of our own veterans and not the people that were shooting at us."

Although prisoners of war are almost always sent home immediately after hostilities 
end,
the situation this time represents a complicated and tangled footnote to an American 
war
that was immensely successful.

This time, the enemy does not want to go home, preferring to embrace its foe.

By war's end, almost 110,000 enemy soldiers were taken to two camps in Saudi Arabia.
The vast majority of them had been captured by United Nations coalition forces. They
eventually were repatriated to Iraq under the auspices of the International Red Cross 
after
Saddam Hussein issued a general amnesty.

But 4,000 remained in the camps. Most apparently had surrendered after reading leaflets
dropped by U.S. planes that guaranteed their safety.

The government of Saudi Arabia has been housing them temporarily in the camps, along
with 25,000 Iraqi civilians who fled their homes during the fighting and another 
10,000 so-
called freedom fighters who fought with the coalition against Hussein.

In early 1992, according to the State Department, it became clear that conditions in 
Iraq
precluded the safe return of many of the 4,000 Iraqi soldiers and other refugees. The
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees concluded that other solutions, such as
resettlement in other countries, had to be found.

Along with the United States, Sweden, Denmark and Norway also agreed to accept some of
the camp refugees.

"These people are refugees under U.S. law," said a State Department official, who asked
not to be identified. "They have been persecuted or have well-founded fears of 
persecution
in their country.

"And the United States has a history of providing humanitarian assistance. I don't 
think all of
these men were pointing rifles and shooting at U.N. coalition soldiers. A lot of them
defected long before the ground war even started."

Many of the 4,000 soldiers were forced to join the Iraqi army or face death for 
refusing to
enlist, he said.

"Most of the Iraqi solders were conscripted, and the coalition forces encouraged them 
to
surrender," the State Department official said. "We dropped leaflets all over 
encouraging
them to drop their arms, come over and we would take care of them."

Clinton Administration officials said that many of the Iraqi military prisoners were 
able to
help the coalition forces in many ways during the war, such as providing information 
about
Iraqi troop strength and maneuvers.

According to a State Department memorandum sent to congressional offices skeptical of
the resettlement program, "many of those persons had provided valuable services to U.S.
forces in the aftermath of the conflict."

The memo also said that since 1992, about 1,000 ex-soldiers and some of their family
members have been brought to the United States. In addition to California and Florida, 
they
also are resettling in Texas, Michigan and Illinois. The State Department would not 
name
specific relocation sites.

Before entering the United States, they must be cleared by the FBI. They also must 
sign a
promissory note to reimburse the U.S. government for their transportation costs after 
they
become self-sufficient in America, a transition that government sources said usually 
takes
about a year.

But under the government's Refugee Assistance Program, they are entitled to free help
from a wide array of sources.

They can receive cash and free medical assistance if they have no financial resources 
of
their own. They also are eligible for job training and English language schooling.

Many in Congress see the effort as an affront to the U.S. military, noting that 
returning Gulf
War veterans did not receive such assistance. In a letter they plan to send to Clinton 
after
seeking more signatures from members in Congress, those opposing the effort noted that
the resettlement of Iraqi POWs ultimately could cost American taxpayers up to $70 
million.

They expressed concern that many of the ex-soldiers could pose a safety threat to U.S.
citizens despite the FBI clearances, pointing out that with international terrorism 
already
hitting the United States, this "raises serious questions concerning our national 
security."

"This potentially dangerous and unfair policy can be stopped. We feel it is not wise to
continue a policy that could eventually threaten the safety of our citizens and 
government
officials," the letter said.

Email This Article To A Friend




AMERICAN FREEDOM NEWS HOME CLICK HERE


Our Pages Are Best Viewed In 800x600 Pixel Resolution Or Higher
Copyright 2002 American Freedom Net

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to