-Caveat Lector-

http://smirkingchimp.com/

Mark Crispin Miller: Is Bush a moron? No, it's worse - he's a sociopath
Date: Sunday, December 01 @ 08:56:06 EST
Topic: Bushisms

Dark overtones in his malapropisms



By Murray Whyte, Toronto Star

When Mark Crispin Miller first set out to write Dyslexicon: Observations on a National
Disorder, about the ever-growing catalogue of President George W. Bush's verbal 
gaffes, he
meant it for a laugh. But what he came to realize wasn't entirely amusing.

Since the 2000 presidential campaign, Miller has been compiling his own collection of 
Bush-
isms, which have revealed, he says, a disquieting truth about what lurks behind the 
cock-
eyed leer of the leader of the free world. He's not a moron at all � on that point, 
Miller and
Prime Minister Jean Chr�tien agree.

But according to Miller, he's no friend.



"I did initially intend it to be a funny book. But that was before I had a chance to 
read
through all the transcripts," Miller, an American author and a professor of culture and
communication at New York University, said recently in Toronto.

"Bush is not an imbecile. He's not a puppet. I think that Bush is a sociopathic 
personality. I
think he's incapable of empathy. He has an inordinate sense of his own entitlement, and
he's a very skilled manipulator. And in all the snickering about his alleged idiocy, 
this is
what a lot of people miss."

Miller's judgment, that the president might suffer from a bona fide personality 
disorder,
almost makes one long for the less menacing notion currently making the rounds: that 
the
White House's current occupant is, in fact, simply an idiot.

If only. Miller's rendering of the president is bleaker than that. In studying Bush's 
various
adventures in oration, he started to see a pattern emerging.

"He has no trouble speaking off the cuff when he's speaking punitively, when he's 
talking
about violence, when he's talking about revenge.

"When he struts and thumps his chest, his syntax and grammar are fine," Miller said.

"It's only when he leaps into the wild blue yonder of compassion, or idealism, or 
altruism,
that he makes these hilarious mistakes."

While Miller's book has been praised for its "eloquence" and "playful use of 
language," it
has enraged Bush supporters.

Bush's ascent in the eyes of many Americans � his approval rating hovers at near 80
percent � was the direct result of tough talk following the Sept. 11 terrorist 
attacks. In
those speeches, Bush stumbled not at all; his language of retribution was clear.

It was a sharp contrast to the pre-9/11 George W. Bush. Even before the Supreme Court 
in
2001 had to intervene and rule on recounts in Florida after a contentious presidential
election, a corps of journalists were salivating at the prospect: a bafflingly 
inarticulate man
in a position of power not seen since vice- president Dan Quayle rode shotgun on George
H.W. Bush's one term in office.

But equating Bush's malapropisms with Quayle's inability to spell "potato" is a 
dangerous
assumption, Miller says.

At a public address in Nashville, Tenn., in September, Bush provided one of his most
memorable stumbles. Trying to give strength to his case that Saddam Hussein had already
deceived the West concerning his store of weapons, Bush was scripted to offer an old
saying: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. What came out was
the following:

"Fool me once, shame ... shame on ... you." Long, uncomfortable pause. "Fool me � can't
get fooled again!"

Played for laughs everywhere, Miller saw a darkness underlying the gaffe.

"There's an episode of Happy Days, where The Fonz has to say, `I'm sorry' and can't do 
it.
Same thing," Miller said.

"What's revealing about this is that Bush could not say, `Shame on me' to save his 
life.
That's a completely alien idea to him. This is a guy who is absolutely proud of his own
inflexibility and rectitude."

If what Miller says is true � and it would take more than just observations to prove 
it �
then Bush has achieved an astounding goal.

By stumbling blithely along, he has been able to push his image as "just folks" � a 
normal
guy who screws up just like the rest of us.

This, in fact, is a central cog in his image-making machine, Miller says: Portraying 
the
wealthy scion of one of America's most powerful families as a regular, imperfect Joe.

But the depiction, Miller says, is also remarkable for what it hides � imperfect, yes, 
but
also detached, wealthy and unable to identify with the "folks" he's been designed to 
appeal
to.

An example, Miller says, surfaced early in his presidential tenure.

"I know how hard it is to put food on your family," Bush was quoted as saying.

"That wasn't because he's so stupid that he doesn't know how to say, `Put food on your
family's table' � it's because he doesn't care about people who can't put food on the
table," Miller says.

So, when Bush is envisioning "a foreign-handed foreign policy," or observes on some 
point
that "it's not the way that America is all about," Miller contends it's because he 
can't keep
his focus on things that mean nothing to him.

"When he tries to talk about what this country stands for, or about democracy, he 
can't do
it," he said.

This, then, is why he's so closely watched by his handlers, Miller says � not because 
he'll
say something stupid, but because he'll overindulge in the language of violence and
punishment at which he excels.

"He's a very angry guy, a hostile guy. He's much like Nixon. So they're very, very 
careful to
choreograph every move he makes. They don't want him anywhere near protestors,
because he would lose his temper."

Miller, without question, is a man with a mission � and laughter isn't it.

"I call him the feel bad president, because he's all about punishment and death," he 
said.
"It would be a grave mistake to just play him for laughs."

Copyright 1996-2002. Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.

Reprinted from The Toronto Star:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?
pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=
1035774887712&call_pageid=
968332188492&col=968793972154





This article comes from The Smirking Chimp
http://www.SmirkingChimp.com

The URL for this story is:
http://www.SmirkingChimp.com/article.php?sid=9243

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to