On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:40:56PM +0200 I heard the voice of Rhialto, and lo! it spake thus: > > Is 'allclean' also a cmake convention? I originally tried > 'distclean' which is the convention that I know about.
Nah, just mine. I guess it doesn't hurt anything to add distclean as an alias. That root level Makefile really is almost nothing; minus comments and whitespace, it's 6 lines defining 3 targets. One that runs cmake to build the real make structure, one that blows away cmake's output, and one that just takes one of (all build ctwm install clean) and passes it along to cmake's build output. > I think we can safely remove imlib support. Yeah. I almost think we get it for free with a cmake move; any system that imconv is installable and running on, cmake isn't ;) ImageMagick probably isn't that easy to drop in; it easily replaces imtools' command line converter programs, but ctwm is using the library, and I understand that ImageMagick's API is not only twisted, but also not very stable (I think that was the reason behind the GraphicsMagick fork). But considering how long it's been not practical and nobody's hisses up a storm for a replacement, we probably don't need one terribly urgently. We already handle XPM and JPEG; libpng support could probably be bunged up if anybody cared much about using PNG's. I sorta wonder how much use anything but XPM's for decorations even gets, but libjpeg ain't going anywhere soon. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [email protected] Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
