On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:00:50 -0500 "Matthew D. Fuller" <fulle...@over-yonder.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:09:01PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Rhialto, and lo! it spake thus: > > On Mon 25 Sep 2017 at 01:14:35 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > > By the way, is there a way to pass an argument to a user defined > > > function, or do I have to make a function for each workspace? > > > > I don't think so, and I have wished for something like that as > > well. > > That would take deeper changes, not the least since it means > f.function would now become our first function that requires *two* > arguments. This isn't a big priority for me, so if this suggestion is anything but trivial, please ignore it. You could have the function take one argument, but the argument is a struct pointer to a string plus a void pointer. It would work in less type-fussy languages, and who knows, maybe there's some trick with the current code to fit this in. Unless this is trivial, please forget I mentioned it. I'm sure ctwm has much more important priorities. Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt September 2017 featured book: Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting Brand new, second edition http://www.troubleshooters.com/mgr
