I hope I won't sound too aggressive here...
Did you even bother to look at 3.7a5? Pretty much every found bug and code-shift problem found in a4 has been corrected and a lot of stuff has been added (introducing new bugs, of course). All of this required some effort, thinking and reorganizing of the code.
How about making an effort yourself (for example looking at the 3.7a5
changelog, verifying the changes made and testing the new stuff) instead of pissing on other people's work?
Again, sorry for the outburst.
//\\ /"\ dL - Dan Lilliehorn \ / ASCII ribbon campaign http://www.dL.nu/ X against HTML email [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Bjorn Knutsson wrote:
Honestly, I think 3.7 should just be quitely dropped and we should restart from 3.6, apply all the bugfix patches and possibly some of well-tested and known-to-be-OK improvements and call this release 3.8.
Then, with the new 3.8 as baseline, people can re-submit whatever patches didn't make it into 3.8.
/Bj�rn
On 21 Feb 2005 00:35, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:[since this discussion isn't really about the reported bug, I'm moving it off ctwm-bugs]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:14:52 -0600, "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
fullermd> I think we should have a bug fix release called "3.7" 8-}
That's a point, except we already have a 3.7 alpha (that needs to be updated and fixed), which feels as much like a bug introduction release as it would be a bug fix release. There are a lot of changes between 3.6 and 3.7, and I'm not sure I've caught up on what they all really do...
Cheers, Richard
----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
-- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis
