On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:37:25AM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Yang Tse wrote:
> 
> >Perhaps naming it CURLOPT_SSL_OPTIONS with the bitmask style
> >argument you mention would be the most flexible.
> 
> Such a take would look like the attached patch. It accepts a bitmask
> with only one defined bit so far named CURLSSLOPT_ENABLE_BEAST.
> 
> Thoughts?

Would the command line option (--ssl-no-empty-fragments) remain the same?

Btw, https://www.eboekhuis.nl/ can be used to test the patch, if you need
so (I have not done so yet). It was reported in the Debian bug.

Cheers

-- 
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html

Reply via email to