On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:15:19PM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>
> >Would the command line option (--ssl-no-empty-fragments) remain the same?
>
> If we go this option naming route then I don't think so. Perhaps
> --ssl-enable-beast would be the name then.
Just nitpicking, but what about naming:
CURLSSLOPT_ALLOW_BEAST
--ssl-allow-beast
(i.e. using "allow" instead of "enable")? IMO it sounds better.
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
