Hi Daniel, 2012/6/13 Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se>: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Marc Hoersken wrote: > >>> I was first going to agree and then a second thought struck me. Why would >>> it ever need to handle more data? If it gets called asking for 20K of data, >>> there's nothing in the API that says the function must return that much. We >>> can safely just make BUFSIZE the maximum amount of data the schannel_recv() >>> function can return without it breaking any properly written code! >>> >>> It would simplify the code without breaking anything... >> >> >> That's a good plan. > > > Would you be able to write up a patch for this? As I don't build for or use > Windows myself I will only mess up some little detail if I try to write this > "blindly" ...
yes, of course I will be able to provide a patch for this. But I would like to give it a little more time until the other SSPI discussions are settled. Or do you have any other recommendations? Best regards, Marc ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
