On Tue, 24 May 2022, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
The CONTRIBUTING document should probably then include a small blurb on
that, and also that the 5 votes is (valuable) feedback to the core team and
not a guarantee of merging.
Sounds like a plan, yes. Documention and explaining the process is necessary
so that users and contributors know and understand what to expect.
The main issue *I think* is exposure, how do we get those thumbs-up votes cast?
I have two thoughts on this:
1. Since the PR author probably wants it merged, there's an incentive for that
person to "pitch" their work to the curl community. Like maybe in a mail to
this list or whatever other means that feel suitable.
2. We could send an email to this list with some interval that collects the
currently pending "needs-votes" pull requests to drive people's attention to
them.
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
| Commercial curl support up to 24x7 is available!
| Private help, bug fixes, support, ports, new features
| https://curl.se/support.html
--
Unsubscribe: https://lists.haxx.se/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
