> On 25 May 2022, at 10:01, Daniel Stenberg via curl-library > <curl-library@lists.haxx.se> wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2022, Ray Satiro via curl-library wrote:
>> I don't think a formal 5 user vote system is a good way to get more >> feedback on a PR but I do think we can make it better with more exposure >> that a PR needs user feedback. > > Okay, so maybe still use the "needs-votes" label but without the thumbs-up > concept and instead insist that people speak up in support of it? I don't think we need to worry about, or formalize, the mechanics of this. The gist of it is that we need feedback in some form and we should encourage users to provide that (and also provide visibility for these PRs) - the thumbs-up reaction might be a lower bar to entry for those users who aren't comfortable commenting on a high-profile Github project. I do think having a threshold defined, even if arbitrary at first, can be helpful for maintainers. Maybe we need to run with this for a while to see if that's 5, 3, 25 or something else first though? -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/ -- Unsubscribe: https://lists.haxx.se/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
