isn't npf a bit young to be named in the same breath as ipfilter and pf ? I'm not criticizing, but it seems a bit early to use it as an argument for nixing pf. Happy to be persuaded I'm incorrect...
-bch On 1/16/15, Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there still much point in keeping pf(4) in NetBSD now that we have > npf(4) (and also ipfilter(4))? > > The last time it was updated was, according to the CHANGES files, in > 2008, to the version coming with OpenBSD 4.2. > Thomas >
