On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Hauke Fath wrote: > We run a busy pf based router @work, and it generally "just works" > where ipf(4) broke - has > <http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=27164> ever > been fixed? > > And npf(4) - no offense meant to its authors - is neither stable nor > feature complete at this point - watch the steady trickle of PRs > against it.
Is the functionality you need already there in npf, or what in particular would you be missing? Thomas
