> >So is this a valid error? This drive was partitioned using the > >NetBSD installer a while back so maybe things have changed? > > I don't know, can you run dumpfs on it and post the results? > If wd0 is the same, do it for both...
wd0 is FFSv2 and I thought wd1 is FFSv1. Not sure what you are looking for. wd0e mounts fine : >fs->fs_cgsize: 0x4000, fs_cgsize : 0x4000 wd0f mounts fine : >fs->fs_cgsize: 0x8000, fs_cgsize : 0x8000 wd1e mounts fine : >fs->fs_cgsize: 0x4000, fs_cgsize : 0x4000 wd1f fails : >fs->fs_cgsize: 0x4000, fs_cgsize : 0x4800 file system: /dev/rwd1e format FFSv1 endian little-endian magic 11954 time Mon Apr 27 21:15:48 2015 superblock location 8192 id [ 4f0f5203 4cbba5a3 ] cylgrp dynamic inodes 4.4BSD sblock FFSv2 fslevel 4 nbfree 2976641 ndir 71728 nifree 8584892 nffree 196963 file system: /dev/rwd1f format FFSv1 endian little-endian magic 11954 time Mon Apr 27 20:44:07 2015 superblock location 8192 id [ 4f11f067 131b65e8 ] cylgrp dynamic inodes 4.4BSD sblock FFSv2 fslevel 4 nbfree 18042732 ndir 48773 nifree 50365910 nffree 36713 as compared with wd0e which mounts fine on all partitions file system: /dev/rwd0e format FFSv2 endian little-endian location 65536 (-b 128) magic 19540119 time Mon Apr 27 21:12:01 2015 superblock location 65536 id [ 54875a10 36aa1af2 ] cylgrp dynamic inodes FFSv2 sblock FFSv2 fslevel 5 nbfree 507082 ndir 2179 nifree 1194404 nffree 1658 file system: /dev/rwd0f format FFSv2 endian little-endian location 65536 (-b 128) magic 19540119 time Mon Apr 27 21:11:57 2015 superblock location 65536 id [ 54875a12 1b3d7e20 ] cylgrp dynamic inodes FFSv2 sblock FFSv2 fslevel 5 nbfree 26614256 ndir 292235 nifree 55388136 nffree 148247
