On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:15:32AM -0700, bch wrote: > Jul 20 23:55:59 kamloops /netbsd: wapbl_discard() at > netbsd:wapbl_discard+0x20c > Jul 20 23:55:59 kamloops /netbsd: vclean() at netbsd:vclean+0x2ae ... > Jul 20 23:55:59 kamloops /netbsd: tmpfs_unmount() at netbsd:tmpfs_unmount+0x2f
For some reason this condition is met: wapbl_vphaswapbl(vp) but why?
