Hi,
thanks for that.
It looks fine to me now.
Frank
On 12/12/16 14:13, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Frank Kardel <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I did try that efore an verified it again. Now routed attempts to install a
local route
for the lo0 interface and fill the log with the EEXIST messages.
That's why I went for LLDATA in order to avoid to analyse routed's inner
workings completely.
RTF_LLDATA is introduced for userland programs to get L2 routes
(ARP/NDP caches), so we don't use it for this case.
Maybe we need a different test for ignoring kernel routing messages.
Yes. I'll investigate more though, prepared another patch:
http://www.netbsd.org/~ozaki-r/fix-routed2.diff
It mimics checks to ignore RTF_STATIC routes. It works for me.
Thanks,
ozaki-r
