Hi Thank you for testing!
I'll commit the patch unless my further investigation denies. ozaki-r On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Frank Kardel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for that. > > It looks fine to me now. > > Frank > > > On 12/12/16 14:13, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Frank Kardel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I did try that efore an verified it again. Now routed attempts to install >>> a >>> local route >>> for the lo0 interface and fill the log with the EEXIST messages. >>> >>> That's why I went for LLDATA in order to avoid to analyse routed's inner >>> workings completely. >> >> RTF_LLDATA is introduced for userland programs to get L2 routes >> (ARP/NDP caches), so we don't use it for this case. >> >>> Maybe we need a different test for ignoring kernel routing messages. >> >> Yes. I'll investigate more though, prepared another patch: >> http://www.netbsd.org/~ozaki-r/fix-routed2.diff >> >> It mimics checks to ignore RTF_STATIC routes. It works for me. >> >> Thanks, >> ozaki-r > >
