On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:05:17PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I think it is the following change (and perhaps more similar/related
> changes) which breaks static linking of applications which wish to
> supply their own implementation of malloc(), and which call, e.g.,
> fork():

I consider it a strong WONTFIX. It's no different from not poviding
posix_memalign etc.

Joerg

Reply via email to