On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 08:28:29PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 15:40, Christos Zoulas <chris...@astron.com> wrote: > > > > In article <7171.1594774...@splode.eterna.com.au>, > > matthew green <m...@eterna.com.au> wrote: > > >Martin Husemann writes: > > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > >> > Replacing malloc is just as invalid from a strict standard compliance > > >> > perspective, so *shrug* > > >> > > >> Why is that? > > >> > > >> We have e.g. shells/standalone-tcsh that does it. Is it broken now? > > > > > >it was, yes. i worked around it a few days ago. > > > > I fixed it by adding the 3 functions to tc.alloc.c both in pkgsrc and > > upstream. > > Would it be reasonable to have a tiny -lmallocstubs that contains the > functions needed to stub out malloc to work with static linking? So > third party apps do not need to play "guess the stubs" across > different NetBSD versions...
That would kind of defeat the purpose. Static linking doesn't exclude pthread for example. Joerg
