On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:11:37AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I think this port is a bad idea. It'll take a fairly long time to > build on pointyhat from all the pkg_adds (and it will be right at the > end of the package builds since it depends on everything else, so the > whole build will end up waiting for it), and it's not useful for > anyone apart from users of marcus' tinderbox scripts. Therefore it > should be reimplemented there instead.
If I add a .ifdef to it which prevents it from being attempted to build on non-tinderbox systems, is that a good solution? Or does the packaging system ignore IGNOREs? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
