On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 06:56:04PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:11:37AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I think this port is a bad idea. It'll take a fairly long time to > > build on pointyhat from all the pkg_adds (and it will be right at the > > end of the package builds since it depends on everything else, so the > > whole build will end up waiting for it), and it's not useful for > > anyone apart from users of marcus' tinderbox scripts. Therefore it > > should be reimplemented there instead. > > If I add a .ifdef to it which prevents it from being attempted to > build on non-tinderbox systems, is that a good solution? Or does > the packaging system ignore IGNOREs?
No, it respects IGNORE..but I still don't see why it should be a port instead of a small shell script included with the tinderbox. Kris
pgpN29BiN9Rjz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
