Hiroki Sato ha scritto:
Gabor Pali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
pg> pgj 2008-08-16 21:42:36 UTC
pg>
pg> FreeBSD doc repository
pg>
pg> Modified files:
pg> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide article.sgml
pg> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng article.sgml
pg> en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/policies
pg> chapter.sgml
pg> Log:
pg> - Take the outdated sections of articles/contributors out of circulation
pg> in doc/
pg>
pg> Discussed with: joel
pg> Reviewed by: joel
pg> Approved by: gabor (mentor)
What is the reason why choosing not updating the article? I do not
think simply leaving the old description is a good idea, and we need
a discussion about which should be maintained before replacing the
existing links because currently administration.sgml and
contributors/ article have some duplicated information.
It was discussed a long ago in a thread started by Joel, and before this
particular change, as well. Gabor sent a mail to doc@ with proposed
changes and nobody objected in removing these parts. One of the other
suggestions was to try to make one list and generate both the web pages
and the article from that one. That might be a better solution, but the
doc and the www tree should be able to build separately, so I think it
would be complicated to implement. I think there are other overlapping
parts, like &os; and the current release entities. Maybe it would make
sense to separate them to a common part somehow and use it for the web
and the doc?
Gabor
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
