"Simon L. Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
si> I have no general problem with merging www and doc closer (might be si> done while considering moving to svn?) and fully requiring having both si> for build of either, but having e.g. www/en as a deep subdir of doc/ si> seems like a rather bad idea to me. si> si> The web site and and doc/ are rather differnet beast wrt. how you si> write content so I see no problem having it in seperate top level si> directories. I agree with characteristics of www and doc are different from each other, but I personally feel there is almost no difference between having them in two separated dirs and having them in a dir. The reason why I like to have www in a subdir of doc is only for simplify the current build complexity due to the separated repos, so I am wondering how other people feel for having www in a subdir like doc/<lang>/htdocs. si> Generally, I think it would be neat (and I looked a bit of doing it a si> few years ago), but I must say I'm not sure if doing it is really si> worth the trouble compared to just making sure we don't have si> duplication of the information. That said, if somebody does it I'm si> certainly not generally against it (considering my below point). si> si> For some parts of our current site I think some of the XSLT magic is a si> bit to magic and hard to understand, so I'm a but conserned going too si> much further in that direction... Yes, I also think we should be careful about that. I will send a patch to -doc before committing for discussing the implementation. -- | Hiroki SATO
pgpl3Pe6WFNlm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
