On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:17:06 +0000 Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:57:12AM +0000, Murray Stokely wrote: > > murray 2006-01-26 09:57:12 UTC > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > en/releases/6.1R todo.sgml > > Log: > > Add kbdmux and sysinstall smp kernel install items from the ideas page > > to the 6.1 Desired Features list. > > I think it's a little late to mess with sysinstall to that extent > for 6.1. Sounds like the kind of thing that could sit in -CURRENT for > months, but hardly anyone would actually be using it. It seems that the > main problem with sysinstall is that hardly any of our developers use > it. > > On to the question: how often does an SMP kernel fail to boot where a > UP one might work? I remember that this used to be a problem, but if > it's still "too often", can we have just the bits that probe for an > mptable (or however we determine that there is more that one processor) > in the UP kernel without suffering that instability? > > What I'm basically asking is how much of the SMP code is really required > just to detect MP hardware? *I* have not had many problems. Ok, I've had none. -- Tom Rhodes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
