On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:19:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:08:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Since silc is off by default (and therefore the package won't change), > >> was this necessary? > > > > There are two viewpoints to this: > > > > 1) The option is off by default so the package won't change, and thus > > PORTREVISION doesn't need to be bumped. > > > > 2) Not bumping PORTREVISION may cause the port to misbehave if it's > > built with old libraries. > > I don't see the logic in this. The port works just fine right now with > the old libraries. Can you be more specific about the scenario you're > concerned about?
Per what I see, shlib version of libsilcclient was bumped during devel/silc-toolkit update. Since net-im/libpurple explicitly depends on named library, PORTREVISION bump is in order, since API could have changed (thus the shlib version bump). If silc-toolkit update was merely a bugfix one, and shlib version retained, PORTREVISION should be left intact. ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
