On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:40:32AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:19:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > Wesley Shields wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:08:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > >> Since silc is off by default (and therefore the package won't change), > > >> was this necessary? > > > > > > There are two viewpoints to this: > > > > > > 1) The option is off by default so the package won't change, and thus > > > PORTREVISION doesn't need to be bumped. > > > > > > 2) Not bumping PORTREVISION may cause the port to misbehave if it's > > > built with old libraries. > > > > I don't see the logic in this. The port works just fine right now with > > the old libraries. Can you be more specific about the scenario you're > > concerned about? > > Per what I see, shlib version of libsilcclient was bumped during > devel/silc-toolkit update. Since net-im/libpurple explicitly depends on > named library, PORTREVISION bump is in order, since API could have > changed (thus the shlib version bump). If silc-toolkit update was > merely a bugfix one, and shlib version retained, PORTREVISION should be > left intact.
Exactly what I intended to say. Thank you Alexey. I have no way of knowing if the API is the same or not so it's best to bump it just in case. -- WXS _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
