On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:26:39AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:30:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 05/11/10 00:47, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > > > > > Doug, the OPTIONS patch as you posted it on ports@ does not play so > > > well with shells/bash-static. I've created shells/bash-static in order > > > to have packages created by the build cluster. > > > > Yeah, I forgot about that port, sorry. I can rework the patch easily > > enough if there is interest. > > An OPTIONS patch would be find - as long as it isn't the default.
What's wrong with it being defaut? Batch builds will simply use the defaults; having an explicit "options" file with required Makefile dances looks bogus to me. ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
