On 05/12/10 09:26, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:30:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 05/11/10 00:47, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
>>>
>>> Doug, the OPTIONS patch as you posted it on ports@ does not play so
>>> well with shells/bash-static. I've created shells/bash-static in order
>>> to have packages created by the build cluster.
>>
>> Yeah, I forgot about that port, sorry. I can rework the patch easily
>> enough if there is interest.
>
> An OPTIONS patch would be find - as long as it isn't the default.
David,
I do have a vague recollection that you had concerns about OPTIONS in
the past, but don't recall the details. There have been a number of
improvements in the OPTIONS framework in the past 2-3 years, can you
share your concerns again and perhaps some (or even a majority) of them
have actually been addressed?
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
