> Isn't the issue whether or not 70 characters will wrap in any of the > places that COMMENT is used? > > > > On 05/14/2011 11:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> marcus 2011-05-14 18:06:56 UTC >> >> FreeBSD doc repository >> >> Modified files: >> en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook book.sgml >> Log: >> Correct a discrepancy between the Porter's Handbook and portlint with >> regard >> to COMMENT. Portlint recommends a COMMENT no longer than 70 >> characters where >> as the Porter's Handbook recommends 60. Given that most people have >> built >> COMMENT based on the portlint's recommendation, update the handbook >> to say >> COMMENT should be no longer than 70 characters. >> >> PR: 156832 >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156832 >> Discussed with: portmgr >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.1105 +1 -1 >> doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml.diff?&r1=1.1104&r2=1.1105&f=h >> > > > > -- > > Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. > -- OK Go > > Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. > Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > >
I put this patch in due to COMMENT being cut off at 60 characters. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
