Joe Marcus Clarke ha scritto:
That makes sense, but given that we have other tools and sites that provide port information, is it better to recommend the shorter COMMENT that may not be sufficient to give a port intro, or should we opt for a slightly longer string? How will pkgng handle this?
Read it in this way: is it better to have a useless pkg_info COMMENT because it's truncated, or a nicer web page displaying ten additional characters and probably a link to the pkg-descr? IMHO if you are looking for a detailed description you have to look at pkg-descr in any way, 70 chars instead of 60 don't make a difference, but a truncated comment is like a 0-chars comment. This is my opinion of course.
-- Alex Dupre _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
