On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 14:22:20 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/04/2011 09:23, Sahil Tandon wrote: > >On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 07:55:28 +0000, Doug Barton wrote: > > > >> Modified files: > >> security/libotr Makefile > >> security/pidgin-otr Makefile > >> Log: > >> Indicate my preference against bumping PORTREVISION in these ports > >> without a good reason > >> > >> Revision Changes Path > >> 1.24 +2 -0 ports/security/libotr/Makefile > >> 1.34 +2 -0 ports/security/pidgin-otr/Makefile > > > >Pardon my ignorance, but is this in response to the chasing of libgcrypt > >shlib bump or something else? > > Preventative maintenance.
Is there an example of when either of these ports was bumped inappropriately? We should not be bumping PORTREVISION without good reason across *all* ports, so I want to understand why these two particular ports that you maintain are being singled out with explicit comments. -- Sahil Tandon <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
