On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 07:29:45 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:29:33PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > Is there an example of when either of these ports was bumped > > inappropriately? We should not be bumping PORTREVISION without good > > reason across *all* ports, so I want to understand why these two > > particular ports that you maintain are being singled out with explicit > > comments. > > I believe that Doug is trying to address very common problem these days when > careless committers bump port revisions without giving sufficient thinking > of whether it is really required. While you are absolutely right in that we > should not be bumping PORTREVISION without good reason across *all* ports, > in reality, not every one is willing to invest some of their time to think > about if PORTREVISION bump is due every time they commit to a port.
Ah, ok. > Also, many low quality PRs are being automatically committed with only > minimal sanity check like tinderbox run. PORTREVISION is harmless and > cheap, so why bother? :-( I would say it's harmful! :) -- Sahil Tandon <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
