On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
ume 2006-04-28 12:03:38 UTCFreeBSD src repository Modified files: etc Makefile etc/defaults rc.conf etc/rc.d Makefile include nsswitch.h include/rpc rpcent.h lib/libc Makefile lib/libc/gen getgrent.c getpwent.c lib/libc/net Makefile.inc getaddrinfo.c gethostnamadr.c getnetnamadr.c getproto.c getprotoent.c getprotoname.c getservent.c name6.c netdb_private.h nsdispatch.c lib/libc/rpc getrpcent.c share/mk bsd.own.mk usr.sbin Makefile Added files: etc cached.conf etc/rc.d cached lib/libc/include nscache.h nscachedcli.h lib/libc/net nscache.c nscachedcli.c usr.sbin/cached Makefile agent.c agent.h cached.8 cached.c cached.conf.5 cachedcli.c cachedcli.h cachelib.c cachelib.h cacheplcs.c cacheplcs.h config.c config.h debug.c debug.h hashtable.h log.c log.h mp_rs_query.c mp_rs_query.h mp_ws_query.c mp_ws_query.h parser.c parser.h protocol.c protocol.h query.c query.h singletons.c singletons.h usr.sbin/cached/agents Makefile.inc group.c group.h passwd.c passwd.h services.c services.h Removed files: lib/libc/net getservbyname.c getservbyport.c Log: - Extend the nsswitch to support Services, Protocols and Rpc databases. - Make nsswitch support caching.
Great work, but is there a reason why this is called cached instead of nscd? There is prior precedent (Linux, Solaris) for nscd and nscd.conf, and cached is just too general. I general, if there is prior precedent for utilities like this, we should try to be more conforming instead of paving our own way. As an example, we have nsswitch.conf, not switch.conf. -- DE _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
