On Thursday 08 June 2006 15:32, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > TR> > I thought the obfuscation was intentional as very few people should be doing > TR> > a 'make world' without a custom DESTDIR these days. Certainly people new to > TR> > FreeBSD shouldn't be doing it; only those with the command hardwired into > TR> > their brains. We've had buildworld/installworld since 2.2.5 (or 2.2.6) I > TR> > think as I've only had to do a 'make world' once to go from 2.2.2 to > TR> > 2.2.6. :) > TR> > TR> Heh, I agree, "make world" isn't really needed. But it was > TR> either a quick comment about it and link to the handbook where > TR> we advocate "buildworld" or remove the world target. Of course, > TR> we could just do nothing and let users continue to submit PRs > TR> about it bombing with a complaint of an undocumented make(1) > TR> option. > TR> > TR> Personally, I was debating on just removing most of the > TR> world target with just a message: > TR> > TR> "The world target has been replaced with the buildworld target." > TR> > TR> But stepped back due to bikeshed potential. ;) > > Hmm, maybe just bomb out on make'ing world without DESTDIR defined? Original > behaviour would be emulated with simply DESTDIR=/ then...
That is what it already does basically. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
